Framework for strategic deployment of hybrid offshore solar and wind power plants: A case study of India

被引:6
作者
Luhaniwal, Jyoti [1 ]
Puppala, Harish [2 ]
Agarwal, Shivi [1 ]
Mathur, Trilok [1 ]
机构
[1] Birla Inst Technol & Sci, Dept Math, Pilani, Rajasthan, India
[2] SRM Univ AP, Dept Civil Engn, Amaravati, Andhra Prades, India
关键词
Offshore solar and wind energy; Site selection; GIS; MCDM; Indian EEZ; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; SITE SELECTION; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; MOORA METHOD; GIS; FARMS; COMPLEMENTARITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Renewable energy sources are gaining prominence as eco-friendly and sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels due to their availability and minimal greenhouse gas emissions. Nonetheless, the critical challenge is the availability of renewable resources, which fluctuates with changes in climatic conditions. This limitation poses a consistent challenge to generating base load power if it relies solely on a single type of renewable resource. Addressing this, integrating multiple renewable sources into hybrid systems has emerged as a viable solution. This study presents a framework, integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques to identify plausible locations for the deployment of Hybrid Offshore Solar and Wind Power Plants (HOSWPP) and the developed framework is demonstrated considering Indian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) as a study area. Using the proposed approach, Indian EEZ region is classified into five suitability classes. The effectiveness of regions within each class is further assessed in terms of complementarity measured using Kendall's coefficient. Findings suggested that Kendall's coefficient for highly suitable class is -0.41 indicating the regions identified in this study are the prime locations for installing HOSWPP. A total of twenty optimal sites for HOSWPP deployment, predominantly in the offshore regions of Tamil Nadu and Gujarat. Eighteen sites are located along Kanyakumari to Thisayanvilai in Tamil Nadu, including areas in the Gulf of Mannar and near Valinokkam are found plausible. The rest of the two sites are in the offshore regions of Gujarat. This study provides a strategic roadmap to increase the renewable footprint, contributing to the global transition towards cleaner energy sources.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
[31]  
IGISmap, About us
[32]   Wind farm location determination by using a two-phased fuzzy decision-making methodology based on fused data with a real case application [J].
Karasan, Ali ;
Colak, Murat ;
Budak, Aysenur ;
Kaya, Ihsan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2022, 41 (11) :1694-1720
[33]   A GIS-based FAHP and FEDAS analysis framework for suitable site selection of a hybrid offshore wind and solar power plant [J].
Karipoglu, Fatih ;
Ozturk, Samet ;
Efe, Burak .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 77
[34]   GIS-based optimal site selection for the solar-powered hydrogen fuel charge stations [J].
Karipoglu, Fatih ;
Genc, Mustafa Serdar ;
Akarsu, Beyhan .
FUEL, 2022, 324
[35]   Solar-wind hybrid renewable energy system: A review [J].
Khare, Vikas ;
Nema, Savita ;
Baredar, Prashant .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 58 :23-33
[36]   Building a grey-based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm site selection [J].
Lo, Huai-Wei ;
Hsu, Chao-Che ;
Chen, Bo-Cheng ;
Liou, James J. H. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 43
[37]   Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a suitable biomass material for maximum bio-oil yield during pyrolysis [J].
Madhu, P. ;
Dhanalakshmi, C. Sowmya ;
Mathew, Manoj .
FUEL, 2020, 277
[38]  
Marine regions, About us
[39]   Method to estimate the visual impact of an offshore wind farm [J].
Maslov, Nicolas ;
Claramunt, Christophe ;
Wang, Tianzhen ;
Tang, Tianhao .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 204 :1422-1430
[40]   A web-based participatory GIS (PGIS) for offshore wind farm suitability within Lake Erie, Ohio [J].
Mekonnen, Addisu D. ;
Gorsevski, Pece V. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 41 :162-177