Utility-based price proportion in cloud resource allocation

被引:1
作者
机构
[1] State Key Lab of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
来源
Mao, Z. | 1600年 / Asian Network for Scientific Information卷 / 12期
关键词
Cloud; Price proportion; Resource allocation; Utility;
D O I
10.3923/itj.2013.6882.6886
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As cloud computing is a new emerging distributed computing paradigm driven by economies of scale it is urgently to find better solutions for cloud resource allocation problem for economy reasons. Although there are lots of research efforts for cloud resource allocation, most of them introduce auction model to analyze the competition among cloud consumers in the condition of resource provisioned by means of indivisible VMs. For divisible resources, previous works are focus on minimizing the cost without considering features of diverse cloud consumers. In this study, utility-based price proportion approach for divisible resource is proposed. In the presented approach, utility is used to specify the features of diverse cloud consumers. With utility introduced, each cloud consumer is focus on the profit but not the cost, where the profit is the utility consumer gained from using resources minus the cost. Furthermore, experimental results show that the approach gains 21 and 15% more profit than common equal resource and cost minimization approaches separately with the same cost. © 2013 Asian Network for Scientific Information.
引用
收藏
页码:6882 / 6886
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2). Amazon Web Services., (2009)
  • [2] Amazon EC2 Spot Instances. Amazon Web Services, (2010)
  • [3] Ardagna D., Panicucci B., Passacantando M., A game theoretic formulation of the service provisioning problem in cloud systems, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 177-186, (2011)
  • [4] Ardagna D., Panicucci B., Trubian M., Zhang L., Energy-aware autonomic resource allocation in multitier virtualized environments, IEEE Trans. Services Comput, 5, pp. 2-19, (2012)
  • [5] Bredin J., Kotz D., Rus D., Maheswaran R.T., Imer C., Basar T., Computational markets to regulate mobile-agent systems, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 6, 3, pp. 235-263, (2003)
  • [6] Foster I., Zhao Y., Raicu I., Lu S., Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared, Proceedings of the Grid Computing Environments Workshop, pp. 1-10, (2008)
  • [7] Maheswaran R.T., Basar T., Nash equilibrium and decentralized negotiation in auctioning divisible resources, Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 5, pp. 361-395, (2003)
  • [8] Mao M., Humphrey M., Auto-scaling to minimize cost and meet application deadlines in cloud workflows, Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp. 1-12, (2011)
  • [9] Prasad G.V., Rao S., Prasad A.S., A combinatorial auction mechanism for multiple resource procurement in cloud computing, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 337-344, (2012)
  • [10] Tan Z., Gurd J.R., Market-based grid resource allocation using a stable continuous double auction, Proceedings of the 8th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing, pp. 283-290, (2007)