Uncertainty quantification of structural dynamic characteristics based on sequential design and Gaussian process model

被引:0
作者
Wan H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Z. [1 ,3 ]
Zhou J. [2 ,3 ]
Ren W. [4 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
[2] Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
[3] The Architectural Design and Research Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
[4] College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen
来源
Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) | 2024年 / 58卷 / 03期
关键词
Gaussian process model; sequential design; statistical moment; structural dynamic characteristics; uncertainty quantification;
D O I
10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2024.03.010
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Monte Carlo method, which is based on finite element models directly, is extremely time-consuming for quantifying the uncertainty of structural dynamic characteristics. To address the above issue, Gaussian process model was introduced to replace the time-intensive finite element model to enhance the computational efficiency of uncertainty quantification. A method for uncertainty quantification of structural dynamic characteristics was proposed based on sequential design and Gaussian process models. Optimal sample points were selected to establish an adaptive Gaussian process model through iterative sample enrichment criteria, thereby improving the accuracy of uncertainty quantification. The high-dimensional integration of statistical moments of dynamic characteristics was transformed into one-dimensional integration under the framework of the established adaptive Gaussian process model, allowing for analytical computation. Two mathematical functions were used to illustrate the fitting process of the adaptive Gaussian model, indicating a noticeable increase of the fitting accuracy with the increase of the number of iterations. Subsequently, the proposed method was applied to the calculation of the statistical moments of natural frequencies for a cylindrical shell, with computational accuracy comparable to that of the Monte Carlo method. The proposed method demonstrated significant advantage in computational accuracy and efficiency, in comparison with the traditional Gaussian process models. © 2024 Zhejiang University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 536
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] LOCKWOOD B, MAVRIPLIS D., Gradient-based methods for uncertainty quantification in hypersonic flows [J], Computers and Fluids, 85, pp. 27-38, (2013)
  • [12] SANTNER T J, WILLIAMS B J, NOTZ W I, Et al., The design and analysis of computer experiments [M], pp. 145-200, (2003)
  • [13] LIN D K J, SIMPSON T W, CHEN W., Sampling strategies for computer experiments: design and analysis [J], International Journal of Reliability and Applications, 2, 3, pp. 209-240, (2001)
  • [14] MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J., A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code [J], Technometrics, 42, 1, pp. 55-61, (2000)
  • [15] YU Xiaohui, QIAN Kai, LV Dagang, Probabilistic assessment of structural resistance of RC frame structures against progressive collapse using random Pushdown analysis [J], Journal of Building Structure, 38, 2, pp. 83-89, (2017)
  • [16] WAN H P, REN W X., Parameter selection in finite-element-model updating by global sensitivity analysis using Gaussian process meta-model, Journal of Structural Engineering, 141, 6, (2015)
  • [17] KALAGNANAM J R, DIWEKAR U M., An efficient sampling technique for off-line quality control [J], Technometrics, 39, 3, pp. 308-319, (1997)
  • [18] JIN R, CHEN W, SUDJIANTO A., On sequential sampling for global metamodeling in engineering design [C], International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 539-548, (2002)
  • [19] SACKS J, WELCH W J, MITCHELL T J, Et al., Design and analysis of computer experiments [J], Statistical Science, 4, 4, pp. 409-423, (1989)
  • [20] HUANG D, ALLEN T T, NOTZ W I, Et al., Sequential kriging optimization using multiple-fidelity evaluations [J], Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 32, 5, pp. 369-382, (2006)