Comparative analysis of seven decomposition and coordination algorithms for optimal power flow

被引：0

作者：

Wang C. ^{[1
]}

Wei H. ^{[1
]}

Wu S. ^{[1
]}

Yang J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy Technology (Guangxi University), Nanning

来源：

Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems | 2016年 / 40卷 / 06期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Area partition; Decomposition coordination; Interior point method; Optimal power flow; Parallel computation;

D O I：

10.7500/AEPS20150601002

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Currently, the decomposition-coordination algorithms used in optimal power flow (OPF) lack a unified basis for comparison. For this reason, the seven kinds of decomposition-coordination algorithm are used for solving the same power system so as to get more objective and fair conclusions. The decomposition-coordination optimal power flow algorithms based on the modern interior point theory are divided into 4 categories by using the area partition method, with the model and calculation process of each algorithm briefly described. The 4 categories are the bus splitting method, the overlap boundary method, the boundary-area partition method and the node decomposition method. In order to fully compare and analyze the performance of the 7 algorithms, 2-region 600-bus and 4-region 1200-bus systems are constructed as test cases based on an IEEE 300-bus system. Calculation results are obtained by means of vector programming, and then a comparison of the convergence, calculation speed, the amount of communication and stability is conducted. Finally, based on the MATLAB parallel laboratory, the parallel performance of each algorithm is tested. Test results show that the approximate Newton direction (AND) method has better performance in terms of calculation speed and amount of communication, while the convergence and stability of the decomposition coordination interior point method (DCIPM) is better than the other algorithms. © 2016 Automation of Electric Power Systems Press.

引用

页码：49 / 57

页数：8

共 22 条

[1]

Carpentier J., Contribution to economic dispatch problem (in French), Bulletin Society Francaise Electriciens, 3, 8, pp. 431-447, (1962)

[2]

Momoh J.A., Koessler R.J., Bond M.S., Et al., Challenges to optimal power flow, IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 12, 1, pp. 444-455, (1997)

[3]

Liu B., Yang R., Multi-subarea parallel reactive power optimization based on APP, Proceedings of the CSEE, 29, 7, pp. 47-51, (2009)

[4]

Li Z., Yang H., Decomposition and coordination algorithm based on proximal center algorithm for reactive power optimization, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 32, 12, pp. 33-37, (2012)

[5]

Liu F., Yan W., Xu G., Dynamic optimal power flow with decomposed predictor-corrector interior point method, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 31, 14, pp. 38-42, (2007)

[6]

Nogales F.J., Prieto F.J., Conejo A.J., Multi-area AC optimal power flow: a new decomposition approach, Proceedings of 13th Power Systems Control Conference (PSCC), pp. 1201-1206, (1999)

[7]

Sun A.X., Phan D.T., Ghosh S., Fully decentralized AC optimal power flow algorithms, IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1-5, (2013)

[8]

Loukarakis E., Bialek J.W., Dent C.J., Investigation of maximum possible OPF problem decomposition degree for decentralized energy markets, IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 30, 5, pp. 1-13, (2014)

[9]

Liu J., Basic issues of the utilization of large-scale renewable power with high security and efficiency, Proceedings of the CSEE, 33, 16, pp. 1-8, (2013)

[10]

Zhang B., Sun H., Wu W., Future development of control center technologies for smart grid, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 33, 17, pp. 21-28, (2009)

← 1 2 3 →