A modified screening estimation of distribution algorithm for large-scale continuous optimization

被引:2
作者
Mishra, Krishna Manjari [1 ]
Gallagher, Marcus [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, QLD
来源
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) | 2014年 / 8886卷
关键词
Estimation of Distribution algorithms; High-Dimensional Optimization problems; Screening Technique;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-13563-2_11
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Continuous Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) commonly use a Gaussian distribution to control the search process. For high-dimensional optimization problems, several practical issues arise when estimating a large covariance matrix from the selected population. Recent work in continuous EDAs has aimed to address these issues. The Screening Estimation of Distribution Algorithm (sEDA) is one such algorithm which, uniquely, utilizes the objective function values obtained during the search. A sensitivity analysis technique is then used to reduce the rank of the covariance matrix, according to the estimated sensitivity of the fitness function to individual variables in the search space.; In this paper we analyze sEDA and find that it does not scale well to very high-dimensional problems because it uses a large number of additional fitness function evaluations per generation. A modified version of the algorithm, named sEDA-lite is proposed which requires no additional fitness evaluations for sensitivity analysis. Experiments on a variety of artificial and real-world representative problems evaluate the performance of the algorithm compared with sEDA and EDA-MCC, a related, recently proposed algorithm. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 130
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Bosman P.A.N., Grahl J., Thierens D., Enhancing the performance of maximum– likelihood gaussian eDAs using anticipated mean shift, PPSN X. LNCS, 5199, pp. 133-143, (2008)
  • [2] Bosman P.A.N., On empirical memory design, faster selection of Bayesian factorizations and parameter-free Gaussian EDAs, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference — GECCO–2009, pp. 389-396, (2009)
  • [3] Brimberg J., Hansen P., Mladenovic N., Taillard E.D., Improvements and comparison of heuristics for solving the uncapacitated multisource Weber problem, Operations Research, 48, 3, pp. 444-460, (2000)
  • [4] Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Saltelli A., An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 10, pp. 1509-1518, (2007)
  • [5] Dong W., Chen T., Tino P., Yao X., Scaling up Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for continuous optimization, IEEE Transactions, 17, 6, pp. 797-822, (2013)
  • [6] Dong W., Yao X., Covariance matrix repairing in Gaussian based EDAs, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 415-422, (2007)
  • [7] Dong W., Yao X., Unified eigen analysis on multivariate Gaussian based Estimation of Distribution Algorithms, Information Sciences, 178, 15, pp. 3000-3023, (2008)
  • [8] Eiben A.E., Smith J.E., Multimodal problems and spatial distribution, Introduction to Evolutionary Computing, pp. 153-172, (2003)
  • [9] Eilon S., Watson-Gandy C.D.T., Christofides N., Distribution management: Mathematical modelling and practical analysis, (1971)
  • [10] Hansen N., The CMA evolution strategy: A comparing review, Towards a New Evolutionary Computation, pp. 75-102, (2006)