Location of acoustic emission of ceramics fracturing

被引：0

作者：

Chu, Liang ^{[1
]}

Ren, Hui-Lan ^{[1
]}

Long, Bo ^{[1
]}

Ning, Jian-Guo ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing

来源：

Binggong Xuebao/Acta Armamentarii | 2014年 / 35卷 / 11期

关键词：

Acoustic emission; Ceramic; Geiger algorithm; Materials examination and analysis;

D O I：

10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.11.014

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

AE (acoustic emission) parameter analysis method is considered in the research on ceramics fracturing, but the position of cracks in ceramics is impossible to be located using the method. The initial value selection of Geiger algorithm is optimized. The algorithm is verified by 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional location experiments, and the location accuracy is analyzed according to the experimental results. The average location error of acoustic emission source on a 200 mm×200 mm2 flat plate is 1.641 mm, and that on a 50 mm×50 mm×100 mm cube is 3.47 mm. The reasons of the error mainly include the properties of material, the accuracy of acoustic emission testing system and the location algorithm. Lots of microcracks occur and grow in a typical brittle material, such as ceramics, during loading, resulting in acoustic emission (AE). Through the compression test and 3-dimensional locating detection of AD95(95%) alumina ceramic specimens, the acoustic emission characteristics are achieved and the positions of cracks are located by the optimized Geiger algorithm. The location result is in accordance with the actual fracture position, and the formation and propagation of cracks in ceramics can be analyzed by the method. ©, 2014, China Ordnance Society. All right reserved.

引用

页码：1828 / 1835

页数：7

共 19 条

[1]

Ning J.G., Ren H.L., Guo T.T., Et al., Dynamic response of alumina ceramics impacted by long tungsten Projectile, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 62, pp. 60-74, (2013)

[2]

Li P., Li D.-H., Ning J.-G., Et al., Dynamic response of polycrystalline alumina under shock loading, Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 16, 1, pp. 62-66, (2002)

[3]

Zhang X.-Q., Yao X.-H., Ning J.-G., Et al., A study on the strain-rate dependent dynamic constitutive equation of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ceramics, Explosion and Shock Waves, 24, 3, pp. 226-231, (2004)

[4]

Yao G.-W., Liu Z.-F., Huang P.-Y., Experimental study on shear response of alumina under combined compression and shear loading, Explosion and Shock Waves, 25, 2, pp. 119-124, (2005)

[5]

Simha C., Bless S.J., Bedford A., Computational modeling of the penetration response of a high-purity ceramic, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 27, 1, pp. 65-86, (2002)

[6]

Rajendran A.M., Kroupa J.L., Impact damage model for ceramic materials, Journal Applied Physics, 66, 8, pp. 3560-3565, (1989)

[7]

Espinosa H.D., Brar N.S., Dynamic failure mechanisms of ceramic bars: Experiment and numerical simulations, Journal Mechanics Physics Solids, 43, 10, pp. 1615-1638, (1995)

[8]

Ravichandran G., Subhash G., A micromechanical model for high strain rate behavior of ceramics, International of Journal of Solids and Structures, 32, 17-18, pp. 2627-2646, (1995)

[9]

Holmquist T.J., Templeton D.W., Bishnoi K.D., Constitutive modeling of aluminum nitride for large strain, high-strain rate, and high-pressure applications, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 25, 3, pp. 211-231, (2001)

[10]

Xu C.-G., Wang X.-Y., A study on the transmission characteristics of liquid acoustic emission sensors , Acta Armamentarii, 19, 3, pp. 242-246, (1998)

← 1 2 →