Effects of Biochar Application Rates on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Purple Paddy Soil

被引:4
作者
Qi L. [1 ]
Gao M. [1 ,2 ]
Guo X.-M. [1 ]
Niu H.-D. [1 ]
Li T. [1 ]
Sun T. [1 ]
Cao Q.-L. [1 ]
Tang J.-H. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing
[2] Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education, Chongqing
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2018年 / 39卷 / 05期
关键词
Biochar; GHG emission; GWP; Paddy cropland; Soil respiration;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.201710033
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to explore the effects of different amounts of biochar applied in purple paddy soil on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, potted experiments using a static opaque chamber and gas chromatography method were used to study the regulations and influences of biochar on soil greenhouse gas emission using five treatments: no fertilizer (CK), conventional fertilization (NPK), 10 t•hm-2 biochar+NPK (LBC), 20 t•hm-2 biochar+NPK (MBC), and 40 t•hm-2 biochar+NPK (HBC). ① Soil CH4 emission flux reduced significantly with all biochar application treatments; the emission flux followed the order, from large to small, of NPK>CK>LBC>MBC>HBC. The CH4 emission flux of each treatment showed a single peak curve, and the peak value was mainly concentrated in the late growth stage of the paddy cropland. During the entire observation period, the emission flux of CH4 was between -0.05 mg•(m2•h)-1and 47.34 mg•(m2•h)-1. The CO2 emission flux of each treatment was complicated and ranged from 32.95 mg•(m2•h)-1to 1 350.88 mg•(m2•h)-1. The CO2 emission flux of the LBC and MBC treatments showed bimodal curves, and the CO2 emission flux of other treatments showed single peak curves. In addition, all biochar treatments delayed the peak time of the CO2 emission flux. The N2O emission flux of each treatment ranged from -309.39 to 895.48 μg•(m2•h)-1, and the N2O emission flux of the LBC treatment showed a bimodal curve, while other treatments showed single peak curves. ② Compared with the CK treatment, biochar treatment can significantly reduce the cumulative emissions of CH4and promote the cumulative emissions of CO2and N2O. The average amount of CH4 cumulative emissions followed the order CK>LBC>MBC>HBC, while the average amount of CO2 cumulative emissions followed LBC>MBC>HBC>CK, and the average amount of N2O cumulative emissions followed HBC>MBC≈LBC>CK. Compared with conventional fertilization treatment, different application rates of biochar addition significantly reduced CH4 and CO2 emissions. As more biochar was added, CH4 and CO2 cumulative emissions were lower. Although the regulation of N2O cumulative emissions on biochar addition was not obvious, the application of nitrogen fertilizer could promote the emission flux of N2O to some extent. ③ Over the time scale of 100 years, the integrated global warming potentials (GWP) of CH4 and N2O emission under different biochar treatment were decreased significantly, indicating that biochar combined with chemical fertilizer is an effective GHG emission reduction measure. © 2018, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2351 / 2359
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Wang S.W., The global warming debate, Chinese Science Bulletin, 55, 19, pp. 1961-1962, (2010)
[2]  
Houghton J.T., Callander B.A., Varney S.K., The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, (1992)
[3]  
Nakicenovic N., Alcamo J., Grubler A., Et al., Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (2000)
[4]  
Yang Y., The greenhouse effect, the carbon sink effect and cost-benefit assessments of the Taihu Lake Basin rice cultivation system, pp. 11-12, (2013)
[5]  
Aguilar-Chavez A., Diaz-Rojas M., Del Dendooven M., Et al., Greenhouse gas emissions from a wastewater sludge-amended soil cultivated with wheat (Triticum spp. L.) as affected by different application rates of charcoal, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 52, pp. 90-95, (2012)
[6]  
Steiner C., Teixeira W.G., Lehmann J., Et al., Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil, Plant and Soil, 291, 1-2, pp. 275-290, (2007)
[7]  
Guo Y.L., Wang D.D., Zheng J.Y., Et al., Effect of biochar on soil greenhouse gas emissions in Semi-arid region, Environmental Science, 36, 9, pp. 3393-3400, (2015)
[8]  
Woolf D., Amonette J.E., Street-Perrott F.A., Et al., Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change, Nature Communications, 1, (2010)
[9]  
Wang M.M., Zhou Q.X., Environmental effects and their mechanisms of biochar applied to soils, Environmental Chemistry, 32, 5, pp. 768-780, (2013)
[10]  
Skjemstad J.O., Reicosky D.C., Wilts A.R., Et al., Charcoal carbon in U.S. agricultural soils, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 4, pp. 1249-1255, (2002)