Determination method of the optimal revenue-sharing coefficient in three-echelon logistics service supply chain

被引：0

作者：

Liu W. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Management, Tianjin University

来源：

Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University | 2010年 / 45卷 / 05期

关键词：

Equity entropy; Logistics service supply chain; Revenue-sharing coefficient; Stochastic demand;

D O I：

10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2010.05.026

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In order to determine the revenue-sharing coefficient of supply chain with a revenue-sharing contract, a Stackelberg game model with the logistics service integrator as a leader was built by taking the non-storage property of logistics service supply chain into consideration. On the basis of the revenue-sharing contract, the value range of the revenue-sharing coefficient was obtained. Then, a solution model for the optimal revenue-sharing coefficient in three-echelon logistics service supply chain was built in a stochastic demand environment, by introducing an equity entropy function to describe the equity principle of profit assignment. With this model, the optimal revenue-sharing coefficient can be found accurately. An example shows that when the revenue-sharing coefficient is 0.840 for the logistics service integrator and 0.848 for the logistics service provider the maximal equity entropy is 0.999.

引用

页码：811 / 816

页数：5

共 15 条

[11] Chen J., Guo F., Shi C., On supply chain revenue-sharing contract design under price-sensitive demand, Chinese Journal of Management Science, 16, 3, pp. 78-83, (2008)
[12] 27, 8, pp. 91-93, (2008)
[13] van der Rhee B., van der Veen J.A.A., Venugopal V., Et al., A new revenue sharing mechanism for coordinating multi-echelon supply chains, Operation Research, 38, 4, pp. 296-301, (2010)
[14] Hou Y., Tian B., Zhou D., Coordination in the three-level supply chain by revenue sharing contracts, Industrial Engineering Journal, 29, 2, pp. 25-40, (2008)
[15] Ilaria G., Pontrandolfo P.P., Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts, Int. J. of Production Economics, 89, 2, pp. 131-139, (2004)

← 1 2 →