Pseudo dynamic tests for a resilient prefabricated prestressed steel frame

被引:0
作者
Zhang A.-L. [1 ,3 ]
Zhang Y.-X. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao W. [2 ]
Fei C.-C. [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing
[2] Beijing Municipal Higher Institution Engineering Research Center of Structural Engineering and New Materials, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing
[3] Beijing Municipal Engineering Research Center of High-Rise and Large-Span Prestressed Steel Structure, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing
来源
Zhang, Yan-Xia | 1600年 / Chinese Vibration Engineering Society卷 / 35期
关键词
Performance-based design objective; Pseudo dynamic test; Resilient prefabricated prestressed steel frame;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2016.05.034
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The structure system and performance-based design objectives of a resilient prefabricated prestressed steel frame with web friction energy-dissipation device were proposed for high-rise buildings. A four-story 3×5 span prototype structure was designed and a 0.75 scale substructure pseudo dynamic test was conducted. The results indicated that the resilient prefabricated prestressed steel frame has a good gap-opening and closing mechanism with self-centering and recovering the structural functions after earthquake; the loss of PT force is within 8% after test to reveal that PT strands, anchorage performance, and applying methods of PT force are reliable; the performance-based design objectives are realized with no gap-opening and damage under a frequent earthquake, with no damage of the main structure and the gap-opening energy-dissipated ability under a specified earthquake, with little damage and the normal serviceability under a rare earthquake, and with a little damage and the normal serviceability under a severe earthquake. © 2016, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 215
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Garlock M., Ricles J., Sause R., Cyclic load tests and analysis of bolted top-and-seat angle connections, Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 12, pp. 1615-1625, (2003)
[2]  
Chou C.C., Tsai K.C., Yang W.C., Self-centering steel connections with steel bars and a discontinuous composite slab, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38, 1, pp. 403-422, (2009)
[3]  
Rojas P., Ricles J.M., Sause R., Seismic performance of post-tensioned steel moment resisting frames with friction devices, Journal Structural Engineering, 131, 4, pp. 529-540, (2005)
[4]  
Wolski M., Ricles J.M., Sause R., Experimental study of a self-centering beam-column connection with bottom flange friction device, Journal of Structural Engineering, 135, 5, pp. 479-488, (2009)
[5]  
Lin Y.C.M., Sause R., Ricles J.M., Seismic performance of steel self-centering moment-resisting frame: hybrid simulations under design basis earthquake, Journal of Structural Engineering, 139, 5, pp. 1823-1832, (2013)
[6]  
Lin Y.C., Sause R., Ricles J., Seismic performance of a large-scale steel self-centering moment-resisting frame: MCE hybrid simulations and quasi-static pushover tests, Journal of Structural Engineering, 139, 7, pp. 1227-1236, (2013)
[7]  
Zhang Y.-X., Ye J.-J., Zhao W., Et al., Pushover study of self-centering plane steel frame, Journal of Seismiclogical Research, 37, 3, pp. 475-483, (2014)
[8]  
Zhang Y.-X., Zhang A.-L., Sun W.-L., Behavior study of self-centering beam-column connections in resilient steel frames after earthquake, Industrial Construction, 44, 502, pp. 160-167, (2014)
[9]  
Zhang A.-L., Zhang Y.-X., Liu X.-C., Research outlook of earthquake resilient prestressed steel structures, Journal Of Beijing University Of Technology, 4, pp. 507-515, (2013)
[10]  
Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, (2010)