Mapping percent canopy cover using individual tree- and area-based procedures that are based on airborne LiDAR data: Case study from an oak-hickory-pine forest in the USA

被引:2
作者
Vatandaslar, Can [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Taeyoon [1 ]
Bettinger, Pete [1 ]
Ucar, Zennure [3 ]
Stober, Jonathan [4 ]
Peduzzi, Alicia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Artvin Coruh Univ, Fac Forestry, TR-08000 Artvin, Turkiye
[3] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Forestry, TR-35620 Izmir, Turkiye
[4] Talladega Natl Forest, US Forest Serv, Heflin, AL 36264 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Airborne laser scanning (ALS); Individual tree detection (ITD); Area-based approach (ABA); Aerial imagery; Photo interpretation; Crown closure; WOODPECKER HABITAT; DENSITY; IMAGERY; ATTRIBUTES; DERIVATION; ACCURACY; CLOSURE; STAND; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112710
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Canopy cover (CC) is the proportion of a forest floor covered by the vertical projection of tree crowns. Recently, it has become common to utilize LiDAR (light detection and ranging) canopy metrics to estimate CC over large areas. However, these metrics are primarily related to canopy density rather than the specific definition of CC. Here, two processes that employed individual tree segmentation (ITS) and area-based procedures based on LiDAR data are presented to estimate CC across the Talladega Division of the Talladega National Forest (93,694 ha) at the plot, stand, and landscape levels. The two analytical procedures were assessed using the results of a plot/grid method as a reference dataset, which focused on CC estimates within 255 field measurement fixed-area sample plots. The accuracy of a third process, employing an imagery-based visual CC assessment, was also compared against the two procedures and the reference dataset. The LiDAR-based analytical procedures were able to provide estimates of CC with an RMSE of approximately 15 %, which is acceptable for landscape-level assessments. Based on the results of this study, we conclude that CC maps, when created using LiDAR data, may be suitable for various operational tasks such as assessing the impact of forest disturbances and helping to determine the habitat suitability for certain wildlife species.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   A Comparison of Modeling Methods for Predicting Forest Attributes Using Lidar Metrics [J].
Adhikari, Angel ;
Montes, Cristian R. ;
Peduzzi, Alicia .
REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (05)
[2]   ICESat-2 for Canopy Cover Estimation at Large-Scale on a Cloud-Based Platform [J].
Akturk, Emre ;
Popescu, Sorin C. C. ;
Malambo, Lonesome .
SENSORS, 2023, 23 (07)
[3]  
American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2023, ASPRS positional accuracy standards for digital geospatial data, V2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J. China Univ. Min. Technol., DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1006-1266(07)60025-X, 10.1016/S1006-1266(07)60025-X]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, ENDANGERED SPECIES A
[6]   Thinning- and tree-growth-caused changes in canopy cover and stand height and their estimation using low-density bitemporal airborne lidar measurements - a case study in hemi-boreal forests [J].
Arumae, Tauri ;
Lang, Mait ;
Laarmann, Diana .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 53 (01) :113-123
[7]   Scale dependency of lidar-derived forest structural diversity [J].
Atkins, Jeff W. ;
Costanza, Jennifer ;
Dahlin, Kyla M. ;
Dannenberg, Matthew P. ;
Elmore, Andrew J. ;
Fitzpatrick, Matthew C. ;
Hakkenberg, Christopher R. ;
Hardiman, Brady S. ;
Kamoske, Aaron ;
LaRue, Elizabeth A. ;
Silva, Carlos Alberto ;
Stovall, Atticus E. L. ;
Tielens, Elske K. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 14 (02) :708-723
[8]  
Bale A.M., 2009, Masters thesis, P103
[9]  
Blaschke T., 2008, Object-Based Image Analysis: Spatial Concepts for Knowledge-Driven Remote Sensing Applications, V1, P817
[10]   Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data [J].
Bouvier, Marc ;
Durrieu, Sylvie ;
Fournier, Richard A. ;
Renaud, Jean-Pierre .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 156 :322-334