Ground Penetrating Radar's (GPR) imaging and applications to pavement structural assessment: A case of Malaysia

被引:0
作者
Muslim N.H. [1 ]
Mohamed M.I. [1 ]
Amin Z.M. [2 ]
Shafaghat A. [3 ,4 ]
Ismail M. [1 ]
Keyvanfar A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Johor
[2] Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Science and Geomatic Engineering, Johor
[3] Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Center of Built Environment in the Malays World (KALAM), Institute Sultan Iskandar (ISI), Faculty of Built Environment, Skudai, Johor
[4] Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Narmak Street, Tehran
[5] Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Calle Rumipamba s/n y Bourgeois, Quito
关键词
Geophysical tools; Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR); Pavement; REFLEX 2D software;
D O I
10.5604/01.3001.0010.0526
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditionally, pavement distress evaluations were carried out by visual observation. Traditional practice requires a person to walk along the stretch of the pavement to conduct distress survey, take photo and measure defects occurred at deteriorated surfaces. However, this approach is too subjective, generates inconsistencies of information, less reliable and time-consuming. Due to these shortcomings, the transportation practitioners in pavement maintenance seek for other alternative tools and techniques to arrest incapability of traditional practices. One of the tools available in the market is Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). GPR is a geophysical tool known by ability to accommodate extensive data in pavement assessment, geotechnical investigation and structural assessment. The application of GPR is such new to most of road maintenance industry in Malaysia. Therefore, this study has been undertaken to evaluate the benefits of using GPR imaging and its application in assessing pavement structures in Malaysia. The GPR survey was conducted in Meranti street located at UTM (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia) campus, and then analyzed using REFLEX 2D simulation software. The finding shows there are three (3) types of information obtained from GPR survey included; identification of raw image and processed image, identification of pavement segments thickness, and identification of GPR response towards surface and subsurface conditions, which illustrated in radargram images. Furthermore, the GPR can perform at high speed and can save time. It is also beneficial for long-term investment due to ability to provide extensive information at a greater depth. The research indicates that interpretation of GPR's radargram images consumes time due to the low resolution. Therefore, selection of GPR system is subject to level of accuracy and clarity of radar images needed in a project.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 51
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Anderson N., Ismail A., A generalized protocol for selecting appropriate geophysical techniques, Geophysical Technologies for Detecting Underground Coal Mine Voids Forum, pp. 28-30, (2003)
  • [2] Bala D.C., Jain S.S., Practical way to identify the false target signatures in GPR images of ground profile, I-manager's Journal on Civil Engineering, 2, 2, (2012)
  • [3] Benedetto A., De Blasiis M.R., Applications of Ground Penetrating Radar to road pavement: State of the art and novelties, Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis, pp. 412-419, (2010)
  • [4] Benedetto A., Pensa S., Indirect diagnosis of pavement structural damages using surface GPR reflection techniques, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 62, 2, pp. 107-123, (2007)
  • [5] Benson R.C., An overview of geophysical and non-destructive methods for characterization of roads and bridges, Use of Geophysical Methods in Construction, pp. 1-14, (2000)
  • [6] Khazanah Istimewa. PM Gembira the New York Isytihar Melaka Destinasi Perlu Dikunjungi Tahun Ini, (2012)
  • [7] Colagrande S., Ranalli D., Tallini M., Ground penetrating radar assessment of flexible road pavement degradation, International Journal of Geophysics, (2011)
  • [8] Grote K., Hubbard S., Harvey J., Rubin Y., Evaluation of infiltration in layered pavements using surface GPR reflection techniques, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 57, 2, pp. 129-153, (2005)
  • [9] Grzyb A., Bryk K., Dudzik M., Mathematical model for vibrations analysis of the tram wheelset, Archives of Transport, 25, 1-2, pp. 55-68, (2013)
  • [10] Hausman J., Buttlar W., Laboratory and field analysis of the TransTech Model 300 Pavement Quality Indicator (PQI) for determining asphalt pavement density, Proceedings of the 2002 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, (2002)