Comparison of three reference crop evapotranspiration forecasting methods based on short-term weather forecast in Zhanghe irrigation district

被引:0
|
作者
Liu M. [1 ]
Luo Y. [1 ]
Wang W. [1 ]
He J. [1 ,2 ]
Cui Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan
[2] College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Three Gorges University, Yichang
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao | / 19卷 / 156-162期
关键词
Daily average modification method; Evapotranspiration; Hargreaves-Samani; Temperature; Weather forecast;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.19.020
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) forecasting is important for real time irrigation scheduling. In this paper we improved the daily average modification method (DAM) and compared 3 ET0 forecasting methods including the Hargreaves-Samani (HS) model, DAM and improved daily average modification method (iDAM) for their accuracy in Zhanghe irrigation district. The data of annual sunshine duration, annual average temperature and annual precipitation of each meteorological stations in Zhanghe irrigation district were collected. The deviation range of these 3 factors were from -2.7% to 7.7%, from -1.2% to 1.2%, from -3.7% to 23.4%. The HS model was also improved for the local use. The ET0 calculated by FAO56-Penman-Monteith (PM) model was used as the control. In the DAM model, the daily annual average value of ET0 was estimated by fitness, which could introduce fitness error in the ET0 estimation. Thus, we improved the DAM by using the real observed historical meteorological data to calculate the daily annual average value of ET0. Daily historical meteorological data of Zhongxiang and Jingzhou Station for the period from January 1, 1999 to May 24, 2014 and the public weather forecasts of 7 days ahead from May 24, 2012 to May 24, 2014 were collected. The historical data were used to calculate the value of ET0 by PM model and the ET0 calculated for the period 1999-2008 and 2002-2011 were used to calibrate HS model and get the correction factors of weather type. The weather were classified into 4 types. The 3 methods were used to forecast ET0 from May 24, 2012 to May 24, 2014. The results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE) of the HS model in the calibration period and validation period were 0.46 and 0.46 mm/d, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.63 and 0.64 mm/d and the correlation coefficients were 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. It indicated that the improved HS model was suitable for ET0 estimation in Zhanghe irrigation district. The correction factors of weather type in Zhongxiang station were highest in the sunny day, followed by the cloudy, overcast and rainy day. The values were higher than North China Plain. The daily annual average value of ET0 by DAM was smaller in the days of 1-150 but higher in the 250-356 days, indicating that the improvement of DAM was necessary. In the Zhongxiang station, the MAE of HS model, DAM and iDAM methods were 0.75, 0.80, 0.76 mm/d, RMSE were 1.00, 1.07, 1.05 mm/d, and correlation coefficients were 0.82, 0.80, 0.80, respectively. In Jingzhou station, the MAE of the 3 methods above were 0.72, 0.90, 0.71 mm/d, RMSE were 0.95, 1.16, 0.99 mm/d, correlation coefficients were 0.84, 0.77, 0.82. Among the 3 methods, the iDAM method had the highest accuracy for the forecast horizon of 1 day but the HS method was the best for the forecast horizon of 2-7 days. With the increase of forecast period, the MAE and RMSE increased, indicating that the forecast accuracy decreased. Overall, the 3 proposed methods were well for ET0 forecasting and the best method was the HS model. In future, we can try to forecast ET0 using the HS model for irrigation forecast in Zhanghe irrigation district. © 2017, Editorial Department of the Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Wang L., Liu Q., Fu Q., Applying the method of time series analysis to forecasting the paddy water requirement, Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 35, 2, pp. 176-180, (2004)
  • [2] Zhao B., Relieving the China's water shortage through the irrigation water trade, Water Conservancy Science & Technology & Economy, 17, 9, pp. 1-5, (2011)
  • [3] Xu K., Lu C., Ji H., Review on calculation methods for crop evapotranspiration, Yellow River, 35, 4, pp. 61-65, (2013)
  • [4] Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Et al., Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, (1998)
  • [5] Cai J., Liu Y., Lei T., Et al., Daily reference evapotranspiration estimation from weather forecast messages, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 21, 11, pp. 11-15, (2005)
  • [6] Zhang Q., Cai H., Wei X., Et al., Research on reference crop evapotranspiration prediction based on PCA, Water Saving Irrigation, 12, pp. 64-66, (2010)
  • [7] Zhang T., Kang Y., Wan S., Shallow sand-filled niches beneath drip emitters made reclamation of an impermeable saline-sodic soil possible while cropping with Lycium barbarum, L, Agricultural Water Management, 119, pp. 54-64, (2013)
  • [8] Chang X., Gao Z., Wang S., Et al., Different growth period forecasting reference crop evapotranspiration based on temperature forecast and Hargreaves-Samani equation, Water Saving Irrigation, 8, pp. 169-174, (2016)
  • [9] Perera K.C., Western A.W., Nawarathna B., Et al., Forecasting daily reference evapotranspiration for Australia using numerical weather prediction outputs, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 194, 3, pp. 50-63, (2014)
  • [10] Mao Z., Forecast of crop evapotranspiration, ICID Bulletin, 43, 1, pp. 23-36, (1994)