Fuel injection technology of heavy fuel aircraft piston engine

被引：0
|
作者：
Ding S. [1 ]
Shao L. [2 ]
Zhao S. [1 ]
Zhu K. [3 ]
Du F. [1 ]
Zhou Y. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Research Institute of Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing
[2] School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing
[3] Areo Engine Academy of China, Beijing
来源：
Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics | 2022年 / 48卷 / 09期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
aircraft piston engine; carbon-negative biofuel; control strategy; heavy fuel; inject technology; two stroke;
D O I：
10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0012
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Fuel injection technology is one of the key technologies of aviation piston engines. Its structure and characteristics directly affect the integral performance of aircraft piston engines. With the requirements of general aviation for better engine performance, the development of fuel injection technology continues. This paper summarizes the current fuel supply systems used in various heavy fuel aircraft piston engines, sorts out the classic models that are applicable to them, and reviews the advantages and disadvantages of the various fuel supply systems. It expounds some cutting-edge theories, simulation calculations and experimental methods used in the study of heavy oil injection technology, and analyzes some difficulties in heavy fuel atomization, followed by relevant suggestions for the study of heavy fuel injection technology. Finally, this paper puts forward some ideas and key technologies for the future development of heavy fuel aircraft piston engine, with a focus on providing technical guidance for the forward development of heavy fuel aircraft piston engines, thus contributing to the sustainable development of China’s general aviation. © 2022 Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (BUAA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1630 / 1642
页数：12
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] CHEN L F, DING S R, LIU H Y, Et al., Comparative study of combustion and emissions of kerosene (RP-3), kerosene-pentanol blends and diesel in a compression ignition engine[J], Applied Energy, 203, pp. 91-100, (2017)
  • [2] PICKETT B M, BURNETTE P F, WELLS S P, Et al., Fire safety tests comparing synthetic jet and diesel fuels with JP-8[J], Fire Safety Journal, 46, 3, pp. 89-95, (2011)
  • [3] DING S T, SONG Y, DU F R, Et al., Analysis on development trend and key technology of aircraft heavy fuel piston engine [ J], Journal of Aerospace Power, 36, 6, pp. 1121-1136, (2021)
  • [4] ZHENG J., Discussion on current situation and development trend of general aviation piston engine, Internal Combustion Engine & Parts, 19, pp. 196-198, (2020)
  • [5] ZHANG Q, DU F R., Small aero-piston engine heavy fuel technology development summary [ J ], Small Internal Combustion Engine and Vehicle Technique, 43, 4, pp. 81-85, (2014)
  • [6] DU C Y, TIAN M Y, HU C M., Technical development analysis of two-stroke heavy fuel aero engine, Small Internal Combustion Engine and Vehicle Technique, 49, 3, pp. 92-96, (2020)
  • [7] HOOPER P., Experimental experience of cold starting a spark ignition UAV engine using low volatility fuel[J], Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 89, 1, pp. 106-111, (2017)
  • [8] WANG Z L., Experimental study on performance of 15 kW two-stroke ignited PFI kerosene piston engine, (2018)
  • [9] SHEN Y G, NIE K, XU J S, Et al., Combustion and emission characteristics of compression-ignition aero piston engine at different altitudes, Journal of Propulsion Technology, 43, 4, pp. 248-256, (2022)
  • [10] TSACH S, CHEMLA J, PENN D., UAV systems development in IAI-Past, present & future [ C], 2nd AIAA “Unmanned Unlimited” Conference and Workshop & Exhibit, pp. 1-19, (2003)
12345678910