The masses of retired A stars with asteroseismology: Kepler and K2 observations of exoplanet hosts

被引:24
作者
North, Thomas S. H. [1 ,2 ]
Campante, Tiago L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Miglio, Andxsrea [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Guy R. [1 ,2 ]
Grunblatt, Samuel K. [4 ]
Huber, Daniel [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kuszlewicz, James S. [1 ,2 ]
Lund, Mikkel N. [1 ,2 ]
Cooke, Benjamin F. [1 ,2 ]
Chaplin, William J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Phys & Astron, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, SAC, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Inst Astrophys, Friedrich Hund Pl 1, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Hawaii, Inst Astron, 2680 Woodlawn Dr, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[5] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, SIfA, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] SETI Inst, 189 Bernardo Ave, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 英国科学技术设施理事会;
关键词
asteroseismology; techniques: photometric; stars: evolution; stars: fundamental parameters; SOLAR-LIKE OSCILLATIONS; RED GIANT STARS; STELLAR EVOLUTION; MAGNETIC-FIELDS; PLANET; PARAMETERS; MISSION; COMPANIONS; PROGRAM; TARGETS;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stx2009
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We investigate the masses of 'retired A stars' using asteroseismic detections on seven low-luminosity red-giant and sub-giant stars observed by the NASA Kepler and K2 missions. Our aim is to explore whether masses derived from spectroscopy and isochrone fitting may have been systematically overestimated. Our targets have all previously been subject to long-term radial velocity observations to detect orbiting bodies, and satisfy the criteria used by Johnson et al. to select survey stars which may have had A-type (or early F-type) main-sequence progenitors. The sample actually spans a somewhat wider range in mass, from approximate to 1 M-circle dot up to approximate to 1.7 M-circle dot. Whilst for five of the seven stars the reported discovery mass from spectroscopy exceeds the mass estimated using asteroseismology, there is no strong evidence for a significant, systematic bias across the sample. Moreover, comparisons with other masses from the literature show that the absolute scale of any differences is highly sensitive to the chosen reference literature mass, with the scatter between different literature masses significantly larger than reported error bars. We find that any mass difference can be explained through use of different constraints during the recovery process. We also conclude that underestimated uncertainties on the input parameters can significantly bias the recovered stellar masses, which may have contributed to the controversy on the mass scale for retired A stars.
引用
收藏
页码:1866 / 1878
页数:13
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据