Assessing social and territorial vulnerability on real estate submarkets

被引:27
作者
Barreca A. [1 ]
Curto R. [1 ]
Rolando D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, Castello del Valentino, V.le Mattioli 39, Torino
关键词
Hedonic models; Local Indicator of Spatial Association (LISA); Real estate submarkets; Social and territorial vulnerability; Spatial autocorrelation analysis; Torino;
D O I
10.3390/buildings7040094
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of social vulnerability is widely studied in literature in order to identify particularly socially fragile sectors of the population. For this purpose, several studies have adopted indexes to measure the economic and social conditions of the population. The aim of this paper is to investigate the link between social and territorial vulnerability and the real estate market, by means of an exploratory analysis related to the possibility that spatial analyses can help to identify spatial latent components and variables in the process of price determination. A three phase approach is proposed, using the geographical segmentation of Turin and its related submarkets as a case study. After the identification and analysis of a set of three social and territorial vulnerability indicators, a traditional hedonic approach was applied to measure their influence on property listing prices. Subsequently, spatial analyses were investigated to focus on the spatial components of the indicators and property prices; their spatial autocorrelation was measured and the presence of spatial dependence was taken into account by applying a spatial regression. Results demonstrated that two indicators were spatially correlated with property prices and had a significant and negative influence on them. The proposed approach may help not only to identify the most vulnerable urban areas characterized by the lowest property prices, but also to support the future modification to the actual geographical segmentation of Turin. © 2017 by the authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Social Protection Committee Indicators Sub-group EU Social Indicators-Europe 2020 Poverty and Social Exclusion Target
[2]  
Schneider M., The 'quality of life' and social indicators research, Public Administration Review. Public Adm. Rev, 36, pp. 297-305, (1976)
[3]  
Davis E.E., Fine-Davis M., Social indicators of living conditions in Ireland with European comparisons, Soc. Indic. Res, 25, pp. 103-365, (1991)
[4]  
Diener E., A value based index formeasuring national quality of life, Soc. Indic. Res, 36, pp. 107-127, (1995)
[5]  
Diener E., Suh E., Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators, Soc. Ind. Res, 40, pp. 189-216, (1997)
[6]  
Segre E., Rondinella T., Mascherini M., Well-being in Italian regions Measures, civil society consultation and evidence, Soc. Ind. Res, 102, pp. 47-69, (2011)
[7]  
Andrews F.M., Withey S.B., Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality, (2012)
[8]  
Bechini T., La disuguaglianza in Italia: Un'analisi multidimensionale per circoscrizioni, EyesReg-Giornale di Scienze Regionali, 7, pp. 64-69, (2017)
[9]  
Calcagnini G., Perugini F., Un indicatore di benessere per le province italiane, EyesReg-Giornale di Scienze Regionali, 7, pp. 70-74, (2017)
[10]  
Grootaert C., Van Bastelaer T., Understanding and Measuring Social Capital, (2002)