Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

被引：33
作者：
Brubaker L. [1 ]
Maher C. [2 ]
Jacquetin B. [3 ]
Rajamaheswari N. [4 ]
Von Theobald P. [5 ]
Norton P. [6 ]
机构：
[1] Loyola University, Medical Center, Building 103, Maywood, IL 60153
[2] Wesley Urogynaecology Unit, QLD
[3] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand
[4] Govt Kasturba Gandhi Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai
[5] Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex
[6] University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salk Lake City, UT
来源：
Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery | 2010年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词：
Cystocele; Pelvic surgery; Prolapse; Rectocele; Uterine prolapse; Vaginal prolapse;
D O I：
10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181ce959c
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Objectives: Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common with increasing high-quality evidence to guide surgical practice. Yet many important basic questions remain, including the optimal timing for POP surgery, the optimal preoperative evaluation of urinary tract function, and the postoperative outcome assessment. This manuscript reviews traditional surgical approaches for POP. Methods: Formal and hand-searching of prolapse literature was conducted by the committee on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery for the most recent International Consultation on Incontinence. The committee (authors) was composed of prolapse specialists from around the world. Consensus recommendations were made following literature abstraction. Results: Surgical correction of POP can be divided into 2 main categories as follows: reconstructive procedures to correct anterior and posterior wall defects and resuspend the vaginal apex or obliterative procedures to close off the vagina. Reconstructive surgery may use the vaginal route or the abdominal route. Conclusions: In addition to recommendations within the report, the committee reaffirms that in planning surgery, the individual patient's risk for surgery, risk of recurrence, previous treatments, and surgical goals are all considered in deciding on obliterative versus reconstructive procedures, and in deciding whether the vaginal or the abdominal approach will be used for reconstructive repairs. Copyright © 2010 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码：9 / 19
页数：10
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Rooney K., Kenton K., Mueller E.R., FitzGerald M.P., Brubaker L., Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195, 6, pp. 1837-1840, (2006)
  • [2] Hsu Y., Chen L., Summers A., Ashton-Miller J.A., DeLancey J.O.L., Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapse seen on dynamic MRI, International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 19, 1, pp. 137-142, (2008)
  • [3] Culligan P.J., Blackwell L., Goldsmith L.J., Graham C.A., Rogers A., Heit M.H., A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 106, 1, pp. 29-37, (2005)
  • [4] Visco A.G., Weidner A.C., Barber M.D., Myers E.R., Cundiff G.W., Bump R.C., Addison W.A., Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 184, 3, pp. 297-302, (2001)
  • [5] Culligan P.J., Murphy M., Blackwell L., Et al., Longterm success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 187, pp. 1473-1480, (2002)
  • [6] Bensinger G., Lind L., Lesser M., Guess M., Winkler H.A., Abdominal sacral suspensions: Analysis of complications using permanent mesh, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193, 6, pp. 2094-2098, (2005)
  • [7] Wu J., Wells E., Hundley A., Et al., Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, pp. 1418-1422, (2006)
  • [8] Brizzolara S., Pillai-Allen A., Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102, 2, pp. 306-310, (2003)
  • [9] Roovers J.P.W.R., Van Der Bom J.G., Van Der Vaart C.H., Schagen Van Leeuwen J.H., Heintz A.P.M., Abdominal versus vaginal approach for the management of genital prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 13, 4, pp. 224-231, (2002)
  • [10] Von Theobald P., Cheret A., Laparoscoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Results of a 100-patient series with 8 years follow-up, Gynecol Surg, 1, pp. 31-36, (2004)
1234567