Development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) hubs in Kazakhstan

被引:1
|
作者
Khoyashov, Nurgabyl [1 ]
Serik, Gaini [2 ]
Togay, Amina [3 ]
Abuov, Yerdaulet [3 ]
Alibekov, Alisher [3 ]
Lee, Woojin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nazarbayev Univ, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Kabanbay Batyr 53, Astana, Kazakhstan
[2] Nazarbayev Univ, Sch Engn & Digital Sci, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
[3] Nazarbayev Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kabanbay Batyr 53, Astana 01000, Kazakhstan
[4] Nazarbayev Univ, Environm Syst Lab, Natl Lab Astana, Kabanbay Batyr 53, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
关键词
Net-zero; Carbon capture; Decarbonization; CCS hubs; CO2 transportation and storage; CO2; CAPTURE; CEMENT; TECHNOLOGIES; PLANTS; IRON;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104259
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The competitiveness of both the power and industry sectors in Kazakhstan is due to the use of cheap fossil fuels. Due to the projected large-scale deployment of renewable energy sources in the future, some portions of cheap coal and hydrocarbon use are planned to be phased out in Kazakhstan. In its net-zero journey, the country still intends to have GHG emissions from reduced use of fossil fuels and "hard-to-electrify" industries such as chemicals, cement, and iron/steel sectors. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a decarbonization solution to existing fossil fuel-fired power plants and other hard-to-abate industries in the net-zero age, which Kazakhstan officially plans to reach by 2060. This study covers three major research tasks on large-scale CCS deployment in Kazakhstan. The study first reveals the "low-hanging fruits" of CO2 capture in the natural gas processing and ammonia production industries, with a low cost of capture of $29 per ton of CO2 captured each, by comparing the costs of capture in Kazakhstan with those of power plants, steel factories, cement plants, refineries, and hydrogen plants. Secondly, this work shows that developing CCS projects in hubs of multiple emitters can bring cost-efficient deployment of CCS in Kazakhstan. Lastly, we presented our vision of how CCS could be a part of Kazakhstan's big net-zero plan in 2060. Our estimates show that 8 CCS hubs in Kazakhstan with a total capacity of 115 Mt CO2/year could cost $87 billion in capital expenditures (CAPEX) until 2060. While CO2 capture remains the most expensive component of CCS process chains globally, compressing and transporting CO2 poses significant cost challenges in Kazakhstan due to the long distances between emission sources and storage sites. Future research endeavors could explore automated tools to optimize logistical considerations and enhance the accuracy of cost estimations. Moreover, further studies should incorporate site-specific data to reduce assumptions and refine CCS potential assessments in Kazakhstan.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Post-combustion capture and other Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technologies: A review
    Ibigbami, Olayinka Abidemi
    Onilearo, Oluwatimilehin Daniel
    Akinyeye, Richard Odunayo
    ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2024, 34 (01)
  • [32] Present day conditions in the world of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects
    Ribeiro e Sousa, L.
    CO2 STORAGE IN CARBONIFEROUS FORMATIONS AND ABANDONED COAL MINES, 2012, : 1 - 23
  • [33] Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in industry sectors - focus on Nordic countries
    Skagestad, Ragnhild
    Onarheim, Kristin
    Mathisen, Anette
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 6611 - 6622
  • [34] Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Risk assessment focused on marine bacteria
    Borrero-Santiago, A. R.
    DelValls, T. A.
    Riba, I.
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2016, 131 : 157 - 163
  • [35] Marine baseline and monitoring strategies for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS)
    Blackford, Jerry
    Bull, Jonathan M.
    Cevatoglu, Melis
    Connelly, Douglas
    Hauton, Chris
    James, Rachael H.
    Lichtschlag, Anna
    Stahl, Henrik
    Widdicombe, Steve
    Wright, Ian C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 38 : 221 - 229
  • [36] Attitudes on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) as a Mitigation Technology within the UNFCCC
    Romanak, Katherine
    Fridahl, Mathias
    Dixon, Tim
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (03)
  • [37] Adsorption application of tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) modified SBA-15@MIL-101(Cr) in carbon capture and storage (CCS)
    Zhou, Gang
    Yang, Siao
    Tian, Yichun
    Liu, Yixin
    Liu, Zhen
    Dong, Xiaosu
    MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2022, 344
  • [38] An ISM Approach for Managing Critical Stakeholder Issues Regarding Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Deployment in Developing Asian Countries
    Abdullah, Muhammad Ridhuan Tony Lim
    Siraj, Saedah
    Ghazali, Zulkipli
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [39] Detailed spatial modeling of carbon capture and storage (CCS) infrastructure deployment in the southwestern United States
    Johnson, Nils
    Ogden, Joan
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2693 - 2699
  • [40] Low carbon unit commitment (LCUC) with post carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology considering resource sensitivity
    ReddyK, Srikanth
    Panwar, Lokesh
    Panigrahi, B. K.
    Kumar, Rajesh
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 200 : 161 - 173