Aircraft conflict resolution method based on satisfying game theory

被引:0
作者
Guan X. [1 ]
Lyu R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Civil Aviation Management Institute of China, Beijing
来源
Guan, Xiangmin (guanxiangmin@camic.cn) | 1600年 / Chinese Society of Astronautics卷 / 38期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Conflict resolution; Low altitude airspace; Multi-aircraft; Priority; Satisfying game theory;
D O I
10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.721475
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multi-aircraft conflict resolution in complex low altitude airspace can effectively provide resolution strategy and 4 dimensional trajectory for the aircraft in real time to avoid conflict, collision and ensure airspace operation safety. However, as the number of aircraft increases, conflict resolution faces the curse of dimensionality to cause difficulties, such as high dimensionality and tight coupling, and is difficult to be solved by traditional methods. To improve the optimization efficiency and keep operation safety, a conflict resolution mathematical model and a new method based on the satisfying game theory are proposed with consideration of the characteristics of the aircraft in low altitude airspace. The "social relationship" is established based on conditional probability, that is, the decision of each aircraft will cause influence to other aircraft. Each aircraft will consider the aircraft with higher priority when it makes decision. The method based on the satisfying game theory, can not only solve the current conflict, but also consider to avoid the new conflict among aircraft in the detection range under the resolution strategy. Hence, the overall benefit maximization can be realized. Finally, the simulation results using the extreme scenario demonstrate that the proposed approach can solve the conflict of large-scale aircraft, keep operation safety and control the cost. © 2017, Press of Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Treleaven K., Mao Z.H., Conflict resolution and traffic complexity of multiple intersecting flows of aircraft, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 9, 4, pp. 633-643, (2008)
  • [2] Li W., Guan X.M., Research on the air traffic flow management based on simulation method, Computer Simulation, 32, 11, pp. 24-31, (2015)
  • [3] Durand N., Alliot J.M., Chansou O., An optimizing conflict solver for ATC, Journal of Air Traffic Control, 3, pp. 1-26, (1995)
  • [4] Durand N., Alliot J.M., Medioni F., Neural nets trained by genetic algorithms for collision avoidance, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 3, pp. 205-213, (2000)
  • [5] Liu X., Hu M.H., Dong X.N., Application of genetic algorithms for solving flight conflicts, Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 34, 1, pp. 35-41, (2002)
  • [6] Jin X.M., Theresearch of technologies of the conflict detection and resolution among multi-aircraft in free flight airspace, (2004)
  • [7] Yang S.W., Dai F.Q., Conflict resolution in free flight based on an immune ggenetic algorithm, Aeronautical Computing Technique, 37, 1, pp. 41-43, (2007)
  • [8] Wang S.J., Sui D., Risk analysis of flight conflict in low altitude airspace, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 45, 1, pp. 116-123, (2010)
  • [9] Guo Q., Nie R.T., Application of improved artificial field method in aircraft conflict resolution, Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 26, 5, pp. 718-722, (2008)
  • [10] Zhang X.J., Guan X.M., Zhu Y.B., Et al., Strategic flight assignment approach based on multi-objective parallel evolution algorithm with dynamic migration interval, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 28, 2, pp. 556-563, (2015)