Representing and Reasoning with Qualitative Preferences: Tools and Applications

被引:0
作者
Santhanam G.R. [1 ]
Basu S. [1 ]
Honavar V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State University, United States
[2] Pennsylvania State University, United States
来源
Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning | 2016年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
automated inference; decision support systems; knowledge representation; model checking; preference reasoning; Preferences; qualitative preferences;
D O I
10.2200/S00689ED1V01Y201512AIM031
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This book provides a tutorial introduction to modern techniques for representing and reasoning about qualitative preferences with respect to a set of alternatives. The syntax and semantics of several languages for representing preference languages, including CP-nets, TCP-nets, CI-nets, and CP-theories, are reviewed. Some key problems in reasoning about preferences are introduced, including determining whether one alternative is preferred to another, or whether they are equivalent, with respect to a given set of preferences. These tasks can be reduced to model checking in temporal logic. Specifically, an induced preference graph that represents a given set of preferences can be efficiently encoded using a Kripke Structure for Computational Tree Logic (CTL). One can translate preference queries with respect to a set of preferences into an equivalent set of formulae in CTL, such that the CTL formula is satisfied whenever the preference query holds. This allows us to use a model checker to reason about preferences, i.e., answer preference queries, and to obtain a justification as to why a preference query is satisfied (or not) with respect to a set of preferences. This book defines the notions of the equivalence of two sets of preferences, including what it means for one set of preferences to subsume another, and shows how to answer preferential equivalence and subsumption queries using model checking. Furthermore, this book demontrates how to generate alternatives ordered by preference, along with providing ways to deal with inconsistent preference specifications. A description of CRISNER.an open source software implementation of the model checking approach to qualitative preference reasoning in CP-nets, TCP-nets, and CP-theories is included, as well as examples illustrating its use. © 2016 by Morgan and Claypool.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 154
页数:153
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Abdulla P., Bouajjani A., Jonsson B., On-the-fly analysis of systems with unbounded, lossy fifo channels, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Aided Verification of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1427, pp. 305-318, (1998)
[2]  
Akers S.B., Binary decision diagrams, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 27, 6, pp. 509-516, (1978)
[3]  
Ashby M.F., Chapter 8-case studies: Multiple constraints and conflicting objectives, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (Fourth Edition, pp. 217-242, (2011)
[4]  
Babar J., Miner A., Meddly: Multi-terminal and edge-valued decision diagram library, Seventh International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, pp. 195-196, (2010)
[5]  
Baier C., Katoen J.-P., Principles of Model Checking, (2008)
[6]  
Ball T., Levin V., Rajamani S.K., A decade of software model checking with SLAM, Communications of the ACM, 54, 7, pp. 68-76, (2011)
[7]  
Bertet K., Gustedt J., Morvan M., Weak-order extensions of an order, Eoretical Compuer Science, 304, pp. 249-268, (2003)
[8]  
Beyer D., Lowe S., Explicit-state software model checking based on cegar and interpolation, Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7793, pp. 146-162, (2013)
[9]  
Biere A., Cimatti A., Clarke E.M., Zhu Y., Symbolic model checking without bdds, Proceeding of the International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, LNCS, 1579, pp. 193-207, (1999)
[10]  
Bollig B., Wegener I., Improving the variable ordering of obdds is np-complete, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 45, 9, pp. 993-1002, (1996)