Finite element modeling and mechanical behavior of masonry- infilled RC frame

被引:0
作者
Deng H. [1 ]
Sun B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
[2] Earthquake Administration, Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration, Harbin
来源
Open Civil Engineering Journal | 2016年 / 10卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bottom frame structure; Finite element modeling; Infill wall; Reinforced concrete frame; Shear resistance; Stiffness;
D O I
10.2174/1874149501610010076
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the analysis of reinforced concrete structures, the infill wall is usually simplified as a diagonal inclined strut to facilitate finite element modeling calculations. However, the actual seismic damage and single frame-filled wall pushover experimental results show that when the earthquake shear force is huge, the top of the infill wall and the beam–column connections are usually, thus the path of the force transfer will be changed. Based on this actual failure phenomenon, a new calculation model which has different contact position between the equivalent bracing walls and the frame columns is generated. Thus, the force analysis is given based on this model, the formulae for calculating the equivalent width of bracing walls, the shear bearing capacity of the wall-filled frame, and the infill wall’s actual participation in the stiffness. A finite element simulation method by ABAQUS is used to determine an empirical formula for calculating the reasonable contact position between the equivalent bracing walls and the frame columns. The verification results show that the finite element model presented in this paper is more reasonable, and the stiffness and shear resistance of infill wall should not be neglected. The calculation formula of stiffness of infill wall presented in this paper is coincided with seismic code. But the calculation formula of shear resistance of infill wall presented in seismic code is higher than the actual value, so it is suggested that calculation formula presented in this paper should be accepted. © Deng and Sun; Licensee Bentham Open.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 92
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Ye L.P., Qu Z., Ma Q.L., Study on ensuring the strong column-weak beam mechanism for RC frames based on the damage analysis in the Wenchuan earthquake, Build. Struct., 38, 11, pp. 52-67, (2008)
[2]  
Polyajcov S.V., On the Interactions Between Masonry Filler Walls and Enclosing Frame When Loaded in the Plane of the Wall, pp. 1-25, (1956)
[3]  
Trapani F.D., Macaluso G., Cavaleri L., Papia M., Masonry infills and RC frames interaction: Literature overview and state of the art of macro modeling approach, Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., 19, 9, pp. 1-38, (2015)
[4]  
Wael W.E., Mohamed E., Ahmad A., Three-Strut Model for Concrete Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames, J. Struct. Eng., 129, pp. 177-185, (2003)
[5]  
Chrysostomou C.Z., Gergely P., Abel J.F., A six-strut model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel infilled frames, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 2, 3, pp. 335-353, (2002)
[6]  
Asteris P.G., Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames, J. Struct. Eng., 129, 8, pp. 1071-1107, (2003)
[7]  
Cavaleri L., Trapani F.D., Prediction of the additional shear action on frame members due to infills, Bull. Earthquake Eng., 13, 5, pp. 1425-1454, (2014)
[8]  
Saneinejad A., Non-Linear Analysis of Infilled Frames, (1990)
[9]  
Chen W.F., Plasticity in Reinforced Concrete., (1982)
[10]  
American Society Civ, "Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures," (ACI530-88/ASCE5-88 and Specification for Masonary Structures)., (1989)