Coupled numerical analysis of ground motion near excavation boundaries in underground mines

被引：0
|
作者：
Wang X. [1 ,2 ]
Cai M. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Bharti School of Engineering, Laurentian University, Sudbury, P3E 2C6, ON
[2] MIRARCO-Mining Innovation, Sudbury, P3E 2C6, ON
来源：
Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics | 2017年 / 38卷 / 11期
基金：
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词：
Ground motion; Numerical simulation; PPV; Wave field simulation;
D O I：
10.16285/j.rsm.2017.11.034
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Ground motion plays an important role in the estimation of dynamic loading for ground support design in burst-prone underground mines. A semi-empirical scaling law is often used for peak particle velocity (PPV) estimation; however, this method does not account the influence of geology and excavation effect on the ground motion in the dynamic support design. For better understanding the excavation effect of boundary distribution in the underground on the ground, the author puts forward a coupled numerical simulation method for non-linear velocity model and FLAC/ SPECFEM2D. Aiming at the high quality and fair quality rock masses, the numerical analysis of the ground motion distribution of an underground stope is carried out. It is found that different velocity models influence ground motion distributions near excavation boundaries greatly. Considering the effects of confining pressure and excavation on the nonuniform velocity model can better simulate the distribution of ground motion near the underground excavation boundary, amplification effect at excavation surface is captured, which agrees well with underground field observation results. Compared with the high quality surrounding rock mass, when the simulated excavation rock is fair quality rock mass, the excavation boundary of the stope has stronger ground motion and wider seismic response. © 2017, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：3347 / 3354and3370
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Kaiser P.K., Cai M., Critical review of design principles for rock support in burst prone ground-time to rethink!, Keynote Lecture, (2013)
  • [2] Cai M., Principles of rock support in burst-prone ground, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 36, 6, pp. 46-56, (2013)
  • [3] Potvin Y., Hudyma M., Jewell R., Rockburst and seismic activity in underground Australian mines-An introduction to a new research project, Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium, (2000)
  • [4] Ortlepp W., The design of support for the containment of rockburst damage in tunnels-An engineering approach, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rock Support in Mining and Underground Construction, (1992)
  • [5] He M.-C., Miao J.-L., Li D.-J., Et al., Experimental study on rockburst processes of granite specimen at great depth, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 26, 5, pp. 865-876, (2007)
  • [6] Kaiser P.K., Maloney S., Scaling laws for the design of rock support, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 150, 3, pp. 415-434, (1997)
  • [7] Kaiser P.K., McCreath D., Tannant D., Rockburst Support Handbook, (1996)
  • [8] Cai M., Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries-Insight from numerical modeling, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 45, 5, pp. 763-772, (2008)
  • [9] Cai M., Kaiser P.K., Dependency of wave propagation velocity on rock mass quality and confinement, The 5th North American Rock Mechanics symposium, (2002)
  • [10] Wepfer W., Christensen N., A seismic velocity-confining pressure relation, with applications, Inter-national Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 28, 5, pp. 451-456, (1991)
123