Thinking about materiality: the value of a construction management and engineering view*

被引:10
作者
Styre A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics, and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
关键词
material agency; Materiality; matter; sociomaterial practices;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2016.1272760
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increased interest for materiality as an analytical category in the social sciences provide construction management and economics scholar with new possibilities to better exploit the detailed empirical data being collected in the construction industry and related fields. While constructivist and other idealist theories have tended to dominate the social sciences since at least the mid-sixties when the social sciences sought to release itself from the methodological dogmatism of the “hard sciences”, materiality is now recognized and subject to theorizing within different social science traditions. This article advocates a broad engagement with materiality within construction management research and presents a series of analytical concepts and empirical studies that stress how the built environment that human beings inhabit is far from passive, inert and stable as common sense thinking easily misleads analysts to believe. An image of materiality that recognizes an agential, dynamic and more fluid nature of materiality is thus arguably conducive to an intellectually stimulating construction management scholarship. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
Harty C., Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach, Building research and information, 33, 6, pp. 512-522, (2005)
[22]  
Judt T., Downhill all the way, When the facts change: essay 1995–2010, pp. 13-29, (2015)
[23]  
Knorr Cetina K., Epistemic cultures: how sciences make knowledge, (1999)
[24]  
Latour B., Technology is society made durable, A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination, pp. 103-131, (1991)
[25]  
Latour B., Woolgar S., Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts, (1979)
[26]  
Lees T., Sexton M., An evolutionary innovation perspective on the selection of low and zero-carbon technologies in new housing, Building research and information, 42, 3, pp. 276-287, (2014)
[27]  
Leonardi P.M., When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordances, constraints, and the imbrications of human and material agencies, MIS quarterly, 35, 1, pp. 147-167, (2011)
[28]  
Leonardi P.M., Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality, Information and organization, 23, 2, pp. 59-76, (2013)
[29]  
Merleau-Ponty M., The primacy of perception and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history and politics, (1964)
[30]  
Nicolini D., Mengis J., Swan J., Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration, Organization science, 23, 3, pp. 612-629, (2012)