Quality assessment of intelligent physical education teaching in universities based on multivariate statistical analysis and regression analysis

被引:0
作者
Li B. [1 ]
Guo W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Sports and Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, Guiyang
关键词
Factor loadings; Multiple linear regression; Multivariate statistical analysis; Smart sports; Teaching quality assessment;
D O I
10.2478/amns.2023.2.00914
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we first propose the basic technical support and service and management of university intelligent physical education composition, and on this basis, we propose a teaching quality assessment model based on multivariate statistical analysis and regression analysis. Among them, multivariate statistical analysis is used to calculate the factor loadings A of physical education teaching, and multiple linear regression is used to establish the teaching quality assessment model and test it. Finally, an empirical analysis of teaching quality assessment was conducted with smart physical education as an example. The results show that the comprehensive assessment value of smart physical education teaching quality based on a multiple linear regression model is very close to the actual value, and the error value ranges from [0.003 to 0.027]. The error values are smaller than [0.0135~0.0921] of the ANN model and [0.0635~0.1033] of the neural network model. The research in this paper can provide scientific quality assessment methods and theoretical support for smart physical education in colleges and universities to promote the development of smart physical education and improve teaching quality in colleges and universities. © 2023 Bo Li and Wei Guo, published by Sciendo.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Zhang M., Wang J., Zhou R., Entropy value-based pursuit projection cluster for the teaching quality evaluation with interval number, Entropy, 21, 2, (2019)
  • [2] Cadez S., Dimovski V., Zaman G.M., Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 8, pp. 1455-1473, (2017)
  • [3] Cladera M., An application of importance-performance analysis to students' evaluation of teaching, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33, 4, pp. 701-715, (2021)
  • [4] Hornstein H.A., Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance, Cogent Education, 4, 1, (2017)
  • [5] Paufler N.A., Sloat E.F., Using standards to evaluate accountability policy in context: School administrator and teacher perceptions of a teacher evaluation system, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, (2020)
  • [6] Polkinghorne M., Roushan G., Taylor J., Considering the marketing of higher education: The role of student learning gain as a potential indicator of teaching quality, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27, 2, pp. 213-232, (2017)
  • [7] Barnes M., Cross R., Teacher education policy to improve teacher quality: Substantive reform or just another hurdle?, Teachers and Teaching, 26, 3-4, pp. 307-325, (2020)
  • [8] Leiber T., Impact evaluation of quality management in higher education: A contribution to sustainable quality development in knowledge societies, European Journal of Higher Education, 8, 3, pp. 235-248, (2018)
  • [9] Daumiller M., Rinas R., Hein J., Janke S., Dickhauser O., Dresel M., Shifting from face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: The role of university faculty achievement goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality, Computers in Human Behavior, 118, (2021)
  • [10] Matosas-Lopez L., Aguado-Franco J., Gomez-Galan J., Constructing an instrument with behavioral scales to assess teaching quality in blended learning modalities, Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 8, 2, pp. 142-165, (2019)