A comparative study on the influence of probe placement on quality assurance measurements in B-mode ultrasound by means of ultrasound phantoms

被引：19

作者：

Department of Engineering, ROMA TRE University, Via della Vasca Navale 62, Roma, Italy ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Engineering, ROMA TRE University, Via della Vasca Navale 62, Roma

来源：

Open Biomed. Eng. J. | / 164-178期

关键词：

Distance measurements; Image quality; Maximum depth; Spatial resolution; Transducer manipulation; Ultrasound; Ultrasound phantom;

D O I：

10.2174/1874120701509010164

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator’s visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent; (c) Field of View settings must be taken into account for measurement reproducibility as well as Dynamic Range compression and phantom attenuation. © Scorza et al.

引用

页码：164 / 178

页数：14

共 19 条

[1] Dudley N., Russell S., Ward B., Hoskins P., BMUS QA working party. The BMUS guidelines for regular quality assurance testing of ultrasound scanners, Ultrasound, 22, pp. 6-7, (2014)
[2] Kollman C., de Korte C., Dudley N.J., Gritzmann N., Martin K., Evans D.H., Guideline for technical quality assurance (TQA) of ultrasound devices (B-Mode) - Version 1.0 (July 2012), Ultraschall. Med., 33, pp. 544-549, (2012)
[3] Branca F.P., Sciuto S.A., Scorza A., Comparative evaluation of ultrasound scanner accuracy in distance measurement, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 83, 10, pp. 103-105, (2012)
[4] Thijssen J.M., Weijers G., De Korte C.L., Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 33, 3, pp. 460-471, (2007)
[5] Ultrasonics - Pulse-echo Scanners Part 1: Techniques for Calibrating Spatial Measurement Systems and Measurement of System Point-spread Function Response
[6] Ultrasonics - Pulse-echo Scanners - Part 2: Measurement of Maximum Depth of Penetration and Local Dynamic Range
[7] Lopez H., Methods for Measuring Performance of Pulse-echo Ultrasound Equipment-Part II: Digital Methods (Stage 1), (1995)
[8] Madsen E., AIUM Quality Assurance Manual for Gray-Scale Ultrasound Scanners (Stage 2), (1995)
[9] Hoskins P., Martin K., Thrush A., Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment, (2010)
[10] Scorza A., A novel method for automatic evaluation of the effective dynamic range of medical ultrasound scanners, IFMBE Proc., 22, pp. 1607-1611, (2009)

← 1 2 →