Performance of vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with indigenous species for decentralized wastewater treatment and biomass production in Kerala, India

被引:0
作者
Pillai J.S. [1 ]
Brijesh Nair A.N. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, Tamil Nadu
关键词
Ecological sanitation Indigenous species Biomass production Vertical flow constructed wetlands;
D O I
10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i02.010
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study evaluates the performance of tropical subsurface vertical flow constructed wetlands (VFCW) having indigenous plants as decentralized ecological treatment systems for municipal wastewater treatment combined with biomass production. The VFCW mesocosms were planted with lignocellulosic grass species suitable to climatic conditions of Kerala such as Cumbu Napier Hybrid grass (Pennisetum purpureum), Gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus) and Palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha). The VFCWs were operated at a hydraulic loading rate (HLR) of 0.1md-1 and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 1 day. During the study period, the planted VFCWs attained significant pollutant removal efficiency than the control system with an unplanted filter bed. The VFCW planted with Cumbu Napier Hybrid grass obtained average removal efficiencies of TSS (89.80%), BOD (89.90%), COD (78.10%), Nitrates (69.07%), TN (44.33%), and Phosphates (51.20%). In the VFCW system planted with Palisade grass, the average removal efficiencies observed were Turbidity (98.70%), TSS (89.50%), BOD (87.90%), COD (72.70%), Nitrates (62.07%), TN (43%), and Phosphates (47%). The treated effluent concentration from both the units conformed to the USEPA guidelines for non-potable water reuse standards. The average biomass yield of Cumbu Napier Hybrid grass during the study period was found to be significantly higher when compared to Gamba grass and Palisade grass. © 2021 Technoscience Publications. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 550
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abdelhakeem S. G., Aboulroos S. A., Kamel M. M., Performance of a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland under different operational conditions, Journal of Advanced Research, 7, pp. 803-814, (2016)
[2]  
Abou-Elela S. I., Hellal M. S., Municipal wastewater treatment using vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna, Phragmites and Cyprus, Ecological Engineering, 47, pp. 209-213, (2012)
[3]  
Almuktar S.A., Abed S.N., Scholz M., Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, pp. 23595-23623, (2018)
[4]  
Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater, (2005)
[5]  
Avila F. G., Chavez J. P., Chimbo F. Z., Moscoso S. D., Pino L. F., Anazco A. A., Performance of Phragmites Australis and Cyperus papyrus in the treatment of municipal wastewater by vertical flow subsurface constructed wetlands, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 7, pp. 286-296, (2019)
[6]  
Brix H., Functions of macrophyte in constructed wetlands, Water Science and Technology, 29, 4, pp. 71-78, (1994)
[7]  
Brix H., Use of constructed wetlands in water pollution control: Historical development, present status and future perspectives, Water Science and Technology, 30, 8, pp. 209-223, (1994)
[8]  
Brix H., Do Macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands?, Water Science and Technology, 35, 5, pp. 11-17, (1997)
[9]  
Brix H., Arias C.A., The use of vertical flow constructed wetlands for onsite treatment of domestic wastewater: New Danish Guidelines, Ecological Engineering, 25, 5, pp. 491-500, (2005)
[10]  
Caselles-Osorio A., Villafane P., Caballero V., Manzano Y., Efficiency of mesocosm-scale constructed wetland systems for treatment of sanitary wastewater under tropical conditions, Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 220, 1-4, pp. 161-171, (2011)