Capability analysis and evaluation methods of underwater wireless sensor network

被引：0
作者：
Wei Z. [1 ,2 ]
Song M. [3 ]
Yin G. [1 ]
Wang H. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
[2] CSSC System Engineering Research Institute, Beijing
[3] Information Technology Center, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing
来源：
Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Engineering University | 2017年 / 38卷 / 10期
关键词：
Connectivity; Constraint parameters; Coverage; Device performance parameters; Durability; Evaluation; Networking; Rapid-reactivity; Underwater wireless sensor network;
D O I：
10.11990/jheu.201605084
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The comprehensive network capacity of an underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN) is affected by complicated factors such as energy consumption, detection radius, and network topology. Thus, networking capability evaluation of UWSN is a challenging issue. To deal with this issue, through an analysis of the relationship between these impact parameters and capability, the capability of UWSN was divided into four items, namely, coverage, connectivity, durability, and rapid reactivity. The parameters that affect the capability items are constraint parameters, device performance, and networking parameters. Measurement models of the abovementioned four capability items were established originally, and the networking capability evaluation process model was presented. Then, an optimal combination of networking parameters can be achieved. The network can achieve advantageous systematic performance under different tasks and environments. Simulation results show that the approach evaluates the capability of UWSN in an objective and efficient manner. © 2017, Editorial Department of Journal of HEU. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1531 / 1538
页数：7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Lloret J., Underwater sensor nodes and networks, Sensors, 13, 9, pp. 11782-11796, (2013)
  • [2] Wang Y., Liu Y., Guo Z., Three-dimensional ocean sensor networks: A survey, Journal of Ocean University of China, 11, 4, pp. 436-450, (2012)
  • [3] Ayaz M., Baig I., Abdullah A., Et al., A survey on routing techniques in underwater wireless sensor networks, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34, 6, pp. 1908-1927, (2011)
  • [4] Chen Y., Lin Y., Mobicast routing protocol for underwater sensor networks, IEEE Sensors Journal, 13, 2, pp. 737-749, (2013)
  • [5] Abbas W.B., Ahmed N., Usama C., Et al., Design and evaluation of a low-cost, DIY-inspired, underwater platform to promote experimental research in UWSN, Adhoc Networks, 34, C, pp. 239-251, (2015)
  • [6] Felemban E., Shaikh F.K., Qureshi U.M., Et al., Underwater sensor network applications: A comprehensive survey, International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2015, 11, pp. 1-14, (2015)
  • [7] Heidemann J., Stojanovic M., Zorzi M., Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges, Philosophical Transactions, 370, 1958, pp. 158-175, (2012)
  • [8] Liu H., Chen G., Jin S., Topology generation algorithm in 3D underwater surveillance sensor networks, Computer Engineering and Applications, 44, 2, pp. 163-168, (2008)
  • [9] Zheng C., Sun S.X., Huang T.Y., Constructing distributed connected dominating sets in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks, Journal of Software, 22, 5, pp. 1053-1066, (2011)
  • [10] Jiang P., Liu J., Wu F., Node non-uniform deployment based on clustering algorithm for underwater sensor networks, Sensors, 15, 12, pp. 29997-30010, (2015)
12