Support of ecosystem services for spatial planning theories and practices

被引:0
作者
Li R. [1 ,2 ]
Li Y. [3 ,4 ]
Hu H. [5 ]
机构
[1] School of International Affairs and Public Administration, Ocean University of China, Qingdao
[2] Institute of Marine Development of Ocean University of China, Qingdao
[3] Institute of Oceanology, CAS, Qingdao
[4] Nantong Research and Development Center of Marine Science and Technology, Institute of Oceanology, CAS, Nantong
[5] National Ocean Technology Center, Tianjin
来源
Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica | 2020年 / 75卷 / 11期
关键词
Ecosystem services; Multiple planning integration; Planning levels; Spatial planning; Values and goal;
D O I
10.11821/dlxb202011011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spatial planning system reform is a critical strategy to promote ecosystem civilization construction in China. In view of the new spatial planning system, how to coordinate human activities and protect ecological pattern as well as natural resources are critical to the reformation, which urgently requires multi-disciplinary perspectives and knowledge. Ecosystem services bridge the ecosystem and the human well-being, serving as an important tool for land spatial optimization and decision making to better conform with the ecological civilization. In the light of construction demands from the spatial planning system, this research investigates how ecosystem services may provide relevant support from multiple dimensions through intensive literature and theoretical analyses. Firstly, this paper clarifies ecosystem services' connection with spatial planning in terms of values and goal. Not only are ecosystem services a carrier of spatial planning to shape the value of natural resources, but they are a government choice for spatial planning to promote public welfare as well. Secondly, an in-depth analysis of ecosystem services' support is performed with functions and contents, which vary across planning hierarchy, including the national, provisional, urban, county and village/town levels. To be more specific, insights are gained into ways that ecosystem services may facilitate the strategic and policy-oriented function, the coordinative function, and the operational function, respectively. From a scale-effect perspective, the vertical coordination across planning levels that could be facilitated by ecosystem services is also discussed. Finally, facing the needs of horizontal coordination emphasized by "multiple planning integration", ecosystem services may play important roles in three aspects: fostering common values among different sectors, coordinating multiple stakeholders' interests, and improving spatial planning technology. Results give theoretical supports and possible paths to direct spatial planning reforms, which may help to expand the application of ecosystem services in policy making. © 2020, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2417 / 2430
页数:13
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Yan Jinming, Chen Hao, Xia Fangzhou, Cognition, direction and path of future spatial planning based on the background of multiple planning integration, China Land Sciences, 31, 1, pp. 21-27, (2017)
[2]  
Healy P., Collaborative Planning, (1997)
[3]  
Williams R H., European Union Spatial Policy and Planning, (1996)
[4]  
Zhang Yongjiao, Fang Chuanglin, A review on spatial planning coordination and China's "Coordinated Planning, Urban Planning Forum, 2, pp. 78-87, (2016)
[5]  
Rutherford R J, Herbert G J, Coffen S S., Integrated ocean management and the collaborative planning process: The Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Management (ESSIM) Initiative, Marine Policy, 29, 1, pp. 75-83, (2005)
[6]  
Warnken J, Mosadeghi R., Challenges of implementing integrated coastal zone management into local planning policies:A case study of Queensland, Australia, Marine Policy, 91, pp. 75-84, (2018)
[7]  
Jiang Bo, Wang Xiaoyuan, Yang Mengfei, Et al., Application of ecosystem services research on a protection effectiveness evaluation of the ecological redline policy, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39, 9, pp. 3365-3371, (2019)
[8]  
Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Et al., Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital, Science, 352, 6292, pp. 1455-1459, (2016)
[9]  
Piwowarczyk J, Kronenberg J, Dereniowska M A., Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: Do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 109, 1, pp. 85-93, (2013)
[10]  
Hansen R, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Et al., The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities, Ecosystem Services, 12, pp. 228-246, (2015)