Review of controlling flow separation over airfoils with periodic excitation

被引:0
作者
Liu Z. [1 ,2 ]
Luo Z. [1 ]
Yuan X. [2 ]
Tu G. [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
[2] China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang
关键词
Active flow control; Airfoil; Flow separation; Periodic excitation; Shear layer;
D O I
10.6052/1000-0992-19-019
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Active flow control is one of the most promising techniques that are employed in aeronautics and astronautics engineering in the 21st century. It will be a new degree of freedom of design for future air vehicles. Using this technique to control flow separation over airfoils is very meaningful for both fundamental research and applied research. Since periodic excitation is an efficient and convenient control method, it is significant to review the investigations on controlling flow separation over airfoils with periodic excitation. An evaluating parameter is introduced firstly, which is followed by some discussions about excitation frequency, intensity, location, and Reynolds number. Three aspects which are extracted from publications and should receive appropriate attention are presented. One is the evaluation criterion of efficiency, which can guide the design of forcing devices and operation modes. Another is the acoustic-dominated mode, which is observed in the high-frequency forcing cases. This mode may exacerbate flow separation. The third one is a phenomenon of drag anomaly that, in certain conditions, form drag is larger than total drag with excitation. At last, some recommendations for future research are made. This review is helpful for applications of flow separation control with periodic excitation. © 2020 Advances in Mechanics.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [21] Allan B G, Juang J, Raney D L, Seifert A, Pack L G, Brown D E., Closed-loop separation control using oscillatory flow excitation, (2000)
  • [22] Amitay M, Glezer A., Controlled transients of flow reattachment over stalled airfoils, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 23, pp. 690-699, (2002)
  • [23] Amitay M, Smith B L, Glezer A., Aerodynamic flow control using synthetic jet technology, (1998)
  • [24] Becker R, King R, Petz R, Nitsche W., Adaptive closed-loop separation control on a high-lift configuration using extremum seeking, AIAA J, 45, pp. 1382-1392, (2007)
  • [25] Brown G L, Roshko A., On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers, J. Fluid Mech, 64, pp. 775-816, (1974)
  • [26] Buren T V, Whalen E, Amitay M., Achieving a high-speed and Momentum synthetic jet actuator, J. Aerosp. Eng, 29, (2016)
  • [27] Cao S L, Li Y, Zhang J Z, Yoshihiro D., Lagrangian analysis of mass transport and its influence on the lift enhancement in a flow over the airfoil with a synthetic jet, Aerosp. Sci. Tech, 86, pp. 11-20, (2019)
  • [28] Choi B, Hong Y, Lee B, Kim M, Kim H J, Kim C., Adaptive flow separation control over an asymmetric airfoil, Int. J. Aeron. Space Sci, 19, pp. 305-315, (2018)
  • [29] Collis S S, Joslin R D, Seifert A, Theofilis V., Issues in active flow control: Theory, control, simulation, and experiment, Prog. Aerosp. Sci, 40, pp. 237-289, (2004)
  • [30] Dandois J, Garnier E, Sagaut P., Numerical simulation of active separation control by a synthetic jet, J. Fluid Mech, 574, pp. 25-58, (2007)