Root cause analysis, Lean Six Sigma and test of hypothesis

被引:31
作者
Sarkar, Shri Ashok [1 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Arup Ranjan [1 ]
Ghosh, Sadhan Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] SQC and or Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Mumbai
[2] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata
关键词
Cause and effect analysis; Lean Six Sigma; Potential cause; Root cause analysis; Six Sigma; Test of hypothesis;
D O I
10.1108/17542731311299609
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose - In implementing Six Sigma and/or Lean Six Sigma, a practitioner often faces a dilemma of how to select the subset of root causes from a superset of all possible potential causes, popularly known as root cause analysis (RCA). Generally one resorts to the cause and effect diagram for this purpose. However, the practice adopted for identification of root causes is in many situations quite arbitrary and lacks a systematic, structured approach based on the rigorous data driven statistical analysis. This paper aims at developing a methodology for validation of potential causes to root causes to aid practitioners. Design/methodology/approach - Discussion has been made on various methods for identification and validation of potential causes to root causes with the help of a few real life examples for effective Lean Six Sigma implementation. Findings - The cause and effect diagram is the frequently adopted method for identifying potential causes out of a host of methods available for such identification. The method of validation depends on the practitioners' knowledge on the relationship between cause and effect and controllability of the causes. Originality/value - The roadmap thus evolved for the validation of root causes will be of great value to the practitioners as it is expected to help them understand the ground reality in an unambiguous manner resulting in a superior strategy for cause validation and corrective actions. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 185
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Alaeddini A., Dogan I., Using Bayesian networks for root cause analysis in statistical process control, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9, pp. 11230-11243, (2011)
[2]  
Allen T.T., Tseng S., Swanson K., McClay M.A., Improving the hospital discharge process with Six Sigma methods, Quality Engineering, 22, 1, pp. 13-20, (2009)
[3]  
Andersen B., Fagerhaug T., Root Cause Analysis: Simplified Tools and Techniques, (2000)
[4]  
Antony J., Six Sigma vs Lean: Some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60, 2, pp. 185-190, (2011)
[5]  
Arnheiter E.D., Maleyeff J., The integration of lean management and Six Sigma, TQM Magazine, 17, 1, pp. 5-18, (2005)
[6]  
Battikha M.G., Reasoning mechanism for construction nonconformance root-cause analysis, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134, 4, pp. 280-288, (2008)
[7]  
Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R.A., Stone C.J., Classification and Regression Trees, (1984)
[8]  
Chang S.I., Tsai T., Lin D.K.J., Chou S., Lin Y., Statistical process control for monitoring nonlinear profiles: A Six Sigma project on curing process, Quality Engineering, 24, 2, pp. 251-263, (2012)
[9]  
Cheng C.-Y., Chang P.-Y., Implementation of the Lean Six Sigma framework in non-profit organisations: A case study, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23, 34, pp. 431-447, (2012)
[10]  
De Mast J., The tactical use of constraints and structure in diagnostic problem solving, Omega, 39, 6, pp. 702-709, (2011)