Urinary catheters: History, current status, adverse events and research agenda

被引:215
作者
Feneley, Roger C. L. [1 ]
Hopley, Ian B. [2 ]
Wells, Peter N. T. [3 ]
机构
[1] North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol
[2] Alternative Urological Catheter Systems Ltd, Bramford House, 23 Westfield Park, Bristol
[3] Cardiff University, School of Engineering, Queens Buildings, Parade, Cardiff
关键词
adverse events; biomaterials; infection; research agenda; Urinary catheters;
D O I
10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For more than 3500 years, urinary catheters have been used to drain the bladder when it fails to empty. For people with impaired bladder function and for whom the method is feasible, clean intermittent self-catheterization is the optimal procedure. For those who require an indwelling catheter, whether short- or long-term, the self-retaining Foley catheter is invariably used, as it has been since its introduction nearly 80 years ago, despite the fact that this catheter can cause bacterial colonization, recurrent and chronic infections, bladder stones and septicaemia, damage to the kidneys, the bladder and the urethra, and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. In terms of medical, social and economic resources, the burden of urinary retention and incontinence, aggravated by the use of the Foley catheter, is huge. In the UK, the harm resulting from the use of the Foley catheter costs the National Health Service between £1.0-2.5 billion and accounts for ∼2100 deaths per year. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of an alternative indwelling catheter system. The research agenda is for the new catheter to be easy and safe to insert, either urethrally or suprapubically, to be retained reliably in the bladder and to be withdrawn easily and safely when necessary, to mimic natural physiology by filling at low pressure and emptying completely without damage to the bladder, and to have control mechanisms appropriate for all users. © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 470
页数:11
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Hanafy H.M., Saad S.M., Al-Ghorab M.M., Ancient Egyptian Medicine, Contribution to Urology. Urology, 4, pp. 114-120, (1974)
[2]  
Milne J.S., Surgical Instruments in Greek and Roman Times, (1907)
[3]  
Nacey J., Delahunt B., The evolution and development of the urinary catheter, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 63, pp. 815-819, (1993)
[4]  
Hanafy H.M., Saad S.M., El-Rafaie M., Al-Ghorab M.M., Early Arabian medicine, Contribution to Urology. Urology, 8, pp. 63-67, (1976)
[5]  
Herman J.R., Urology: A View Through the Retrospectoscope, (1973)
[6]  
Hume E.H., Medicine in China, old and new, Annals of Medical History, 2, pp. 272-280, (1930)
[7]  
Murphy L.J.T., The History of Urology, (1972)
[8]  
Pare A., Dix livres de la chirurgie (Paris: Jean le Royer), First English Translation
[9]  
Mattelaer J.J., Billiet L., Catheters and sounds: The history of bladder catheterisation, Paraplegia, 33, pp. 429-433, (1995)
[10]  
Petit J.J., Traité des Maladies Chirurgicales, (1790)