Illite and chlorite cementation of siliciclastic sandstones influenced by clay grain cutans

The distribution and amount of clay rim cements are different for Permian Rotliegend and Lower Triassic Bunter sandstones in the Southern Permian and German Triassic Basins, respectively. Both are similar fluvial-aeolian deposits in hot-arid endorheic basins. In both Permian and Triassic sandstones clay grain cutans can be present, but clay rim cement is often lacking or rare in Bunter sandstones. At first sight it would appear that the presence of cutans is thus not relevant for the development of clay cementation. However, at closer inspection, it appears that authigenic clay is indeed present in both cases. In Rotliegend sandstones, the authigenic clay mainly developed as rims around the clay grain cutans, which are often thin and well microlaminated with few intra-micropores and composed of platy particles. The clay crystals in the rim decrease the pore interconnectivity and lower permeability significantly. In Bunter sandstones, most of the authigenic clay developed within the cutans. These cutans are less well microlaminated, have ample micropores, and are composed of more equant-shaped particles. The latter looser structure facilitated clay authigenesis within the cutans and their micropores. This often led to exfoliation of the cutan laminae and expansion of the entire cutan. These expanded cutans also lower pore connectivity. The presence and thickness of clay rim cement on top of cutans and grains is thus not correlated with the thickness of the cutans but with the texture of the cutans. The latter determined where authigenic clays precipitated and the thickness of cutans is partly the result of clay authigenesis within the cutans. This demonstrates that the composition and the texture of sedimentary components constrained and controlled burial diagenesis. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd