Mid-long Term Runoff Prediction Based on a Lasso and SVR Hybrid Method

被引:0
作者
Xie S. [1 ]
Huang Y. [1 ]
Li T. [1 ]
Liu Z. [2 ]
Wang J. [2 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Hydrosicence and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing
[2] Daqiao Hydropower Development Corporation, Liangshan,Yi Autonomous Prefecture
来源
Yingyong Jichu yu Gongcheng Kexue Xuebao/Journal of Basic Science and Engineering | 2018年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Lasso; Longyangxia reservoir; Mid-long term runoff prediction; Predictor selection; Support vector regression;
D O I
10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2018.04.003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The longer the forecast lead time,the better the effect of decision-making support for reservoir operation schedule.The main challengings of mid-long term runoff forecast are randomness of runoff time series and lack of reliable weather forecasting with same forecast lead time.Consequently,many data-driven models are proposed to simulate monthly runoff time series,and the inputs of those model are mostly previous runoff series and climatologic factors.However,the influence of input variables selection on simulation results are seldom discussed,although input variables selection is much crucial.In this paper,the lasso method is used to facilitate predictors selection for developing support vector regression (SVR) model for monthly runoff prediction at the Longyangxia reservoir,which is called LSVR model.The application results of the developed LSVR model are compared with those of the traditional SVR model to investigate influence of predictor selection on forecasting results and the performance of LSVR model.The results demonstrate that runoff predictors selection has significant impact on forecasting effectiveness of both two models.The results indicate that the performance of the developed LSVR model is significant better than that of the traditional SVR model in both validation and verification periods,since the LSVR model can preferentially choose positive predictors and weaken the influence of negative predictors.The simulation accuracy of the runoff forecast with one-month lead time from January 2010 to October 2016 by the LSVR model has been improved by 13.09% with the mean squared error (MSE) evaluating indicator,comparing with that by of the SVR model. © 2018, The Editorial Board of Journal of Basic Science and Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 722
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Zhou H., Wu L., Guo Y., Mid- and long term hydrologic forecasting for drainage area based on WNN and FRM, International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 7-12, (2006)
[2]  
Zhao T., Yang D., Li M., Exceedance probability method for mid-term and long-term streamflow prediction, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 42, 6, pp. 692-699, (2011)
[3]  
Carlson R.F., Maccormick A.J.A., Watts D.G., Application of linear random models to four annual streamflow series, Water Resources Research, 6, 4, pp. 1070-1078, (1970)
[4]  
Bender M., Simonovic S., Time-series modeling for long-range stream flow forecasting, Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management, 120, 6, pp. 857-870, (1994)
[5]  
Ooms M., Franses P.H., A seasonal periodic long memory model for monthly river flows, Econometric Institute Research Papers, 16, 6, pp. 559-569, (1998)
[6]  
Zhang J., Wei W., Long time runoff forecasting with neural network method for Long Yangxia hydropower station, Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, pp. 99-104, (1995)
[7]  
Karunanithi N., Grenney W.J., Whitley D., Et al., Neural networks for river flow prediction, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 8, 2, pp. 201-220, (1994)
[8]  
Thirumalaiah K., Deo M.C., Hydrological forecasting using neural networks, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5, 2, pp. 180-189, (2000)
[9]  
Jain A., Indurthy S.K.V.P., Comparative analysis of event based rainfall-runoff modeling techniques: Deterministic, statistical, and artificial neural networks, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8, 2, pp. 93-98, (2003)
[10]  
Lin J.Y., Cheng C.T., Chau K.W., Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51, 4, pp. 599-612, (2006)