Cool species in tedious landscapes: Ecosystem services and disservices affect nature-based recreation in cultural landscapes

被引:0
|
作者
Brambilla M. [1 ,2 ]
Ronchi S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Fondazione Lombardia per l'Ambiente, Settore Biodiversità e Aree protette, Largo 10 luglio 1976 1, Seveso, I-20822, MB
[2] Museo delle Scienze, Sezione Zoologia dei Vertebrati, Corso della Scienza e del Lavoro 3, Trento
[3] Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, via Bonardi 3, Milano
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Birding; Birds; Cultural Ecosystem Services; Farming; Vineyards;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106485
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are the non-material benefits that people get from ecosystems; they have been less frequently investigated and incorporated into the decision-making processes in comparison to other ES. Ecosystems may also provide Cultural Ecosystem Disservices (CED), because of the bad feelings or perceptions they trigger. Nature-based recreation is an example of CES strictly linked to biodiversity. This paper is focused on cultural landscapes, which are particularly important for nature-based recreation and CES in general. We evaluated the potential CES and CED provided by bird species, and the habitats they occur in, to birdwatchers in Oltrepò pavese (Lombardy, Italy). We found that the number of observations by birdwatchers at the municipality level was positively affected by the number of target species for birders, as well as by a very negative effect of vineyard proportional cover. The number of target species per municipality was positively affected by shrubland and, marginally, vineyard cover, and negatively by urbanized areas. While the strong positive link between avian values and birdwatching rate (and hence, the CES provided by birds) was expected (confirming the potential use of selected bird species as indicators for CES), the strong negative impact (with associated CED) of vineyards was less obvious. Evidence pointed out that vineyard-dominated landscapes were perceived by birders as poorly suitable for birding. The potential reasons of such a negative perception could be the detrimental effect of extremely high vineyard cover on several species, and/or the decline of some conservation-priority species in the area partly caused by the conversion of semi-natural habitats into vineyards. The mild climate suitable for wine growing is favoured by the rarest species, and the occurrence of suitable marginal features (grassland, shrubland, hedgerows, etc.) is higher in the vineyard belt than in many other areas within the region, enhancing its suitability for several species. Vineyards are key components of cultural landscapes and are associated with high avian values in the area, but their occurrence discourages nature-based recreation resulting in a CED. Implementing biodiversity-friendly management practices and restoring key marginal features could both increase the environmental value of vineyards and improve the perception of vineyard value in nature-based recreationists, potentially triggering the transition from a cultural disservice into a cultural ecosystem service. A positive circularity could be expected, with the higher attractiveness granted by biodiversity-friendly practices stimulating more farmers to adopt them, with positive outcomes for nature conservation. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] Are river landscapes outstanding in providing cultural ecosystem services? An indicator-based exploration in Germany
    Thiele, Julia
    von Haaren, Christina
    Albert, Christian
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 101 : 31 - 40
  • [12] IMPORTANCE-SATISFACTION ANALYSIS OF CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL LANDSCAPES DESIGNED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
    Yang Qingjuan
    Dobbie, Meredith Frances
    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FRONTIERS, 2019, 7 (01) : 52 - 67
  • [13] Analysis of the relationship between cross-cultural perceptions of landscapes and cultural ecosystem services in Genheyuan region, Northeast China
    Dou, Yuehan
    Yu, Xiubo
    Bakker, Martha
    De Groot, Rudolf
    Carsjens, Gerrit J.
    Duan, Houlang
    Huang, Chao
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 43
  • [14] Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of western China
    Dou, Yuehan
    Zhen, Lin
    Yu, Xiubo
    Bakker, Martha
    Carsjens, Gerrit-Jan
    Xue, Zhichao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 646 : 685 - 695
  • [15] Extracting sensory experiences and cultural ecosystem services from actively crowdsourced descriptions of everyday lived landscapes
    Baer, Manuel F.
    Wartmann, Flurina
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Purves, Ross S.
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [16] Envisioning alternative futures of cultural ecosystem services supply in the coastal landscapes of Southwestern Ghana, West Africa
    Kankam S.
    Inkoom J.N.
    Koo H.
    Fürst C.
    Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2021, 3 (3) : 309 - 328
  • [17] Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users
    Acharya, Ram Prasad
    Maraseni, Tek Narayan
    Cockfield, Geoff
    ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2021, 78 (02)
  • [18] Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Cook, Elizabeth M.
    Beltran, Bray J.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 107
  • [19] Towards an indicator-based assessment of cultural heritage as a cultural ecosystem service - A case study of Scottish landscapes
    Stanik, Nils
    Aalders, Inge
    Miller, David
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 95 : 288 - 297
  • [20] Revealing Spatial Patterns of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Four Agricultural Landscapes: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China
    He, Shan
    Hu, Chenxia
    Li, Jianfeng
    Wu, Jieyi
    Xu, Qian
    Lin, Lin
    Zhu, Congmou
    Li, Yongjun
    Zhou, Mengmeng
    Zhu, Luyao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (15)