The Carceral State: Implications for Information and Technology Research and Practice

被引：0

作者：

Hutlman, Samuel ^{[1
]}

Salimy, Arian ^{[1
]}

Serrano, Uriel ^{[1
]}

Crooks, Roderic ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] University of California, Irvine

来源：

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2024年 / 61卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

Carceral State; Information; Surveillance; Technology;

D O I：

10.1002/pra2.1148

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This systematic literature review synthesizes published sources from the ASIS&T Digital Library and the ACM Digital Library to develop a definition of the carceral state and to show how the term has been used in contemporary technology-focused research. The carceral state concept has been adopted and applied widely in multiple areas of social scientific research to refer to the formal institutions of the criminal justice system proper and other social arrangements, ideologies, practices, and technologies that punish, surveil, and contain populations. Our review reveals a recent and increasing engagement with the carceral state in the collections surveyed. Encouraged by this increasing attention, this review is an attempt to introduce the carceral state as a guiding framework for tech-society research and to consider implications for advancing responsibility, reflexivity, and care in the creation and evaluation of information systems, programs, and services. Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology | Oct. 25 – 29, 2024 | Calgary, AB, Canada.

引用

页码：943 / 946

页数：3

共 32 条

[1]

Alkhatib A., To live in their utopia: Why algorithmic systems create absurd outcomes. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2021)

[2]

Ashktorab Z., Dugan C., Johnson J., Pan Q., Zhang W., Kumaravel S., Quigley A., Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, (2021)

[3]

Baecker R.M., Grudin J., Digital Dreams Have Become Nightmares: What We Must Do, (2024)

[4]

Benjamin R., Captivating technology: Race, carceral technoscience, and liberatory imagination in everyday life, (2019)

[5]

Bonhomme E., Black Radical Design, Interactions, 29, 1, pp. 20-22, (2022)

[6]

Carrera D., Ovienmhada U., Hussein S., Soden R., The Unseen Landscape of Abolitionism: Examining the role of digital maps in grassroots organizing, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7, CSCW2, pp. 1-29, (2023)

[7]

Chordia I., Leveraging transformative justice in organizing collective action towards Community Safety. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, (2022)

[8]

Costello K.L., Floegel D., Predictive ads are not doctors”: Mental health tracking and technology companies, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1, (2020)

[9]

Crooks R., Seeking Liberation: Surveillance, Datafication, and Race, Surveillance & Society, 20, 4, pp. 413-419, (2022)

[10]

Dickinson J., Arthur J., Shiparski M., Bianca A., Gonzalez A., Erete S., Amplifying community-led violence prevention as a counter to structural oppression, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5, CSCW1, pp. 1-28, (2021)

← 1 2 3 4 →