Group strategy for remaining tags in anti-collision algorithm for RFID system

被引：0
作者：
Wang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Tang X. [2 ]
Zhang L. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
[2] School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
来源：
Dianzi Yu Xinxi Xuebao/Journal of Electronics and Information Technology | 2016年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词：
Anti-collision algorithm; Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID); Tag estimation; Tag identification;
D O I：
10.11999/JEIT150745
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In RFID systems, tag anti-collision algorithm is significantly important for fast tag identification, especially in mobile scenarios. A Group Strategy for Remaining tags Algorithm (GSRA) is proposed. It is divided into two phases, which are the identification of remaining tags and the identification of new arriving tags, and stay tag information grouped is stored and updated, so as to improve the identification efficiency of the stay tag. The theoretic analysis shows that the system efficiency only concerns the rate of migration and static system efficiency, and is not related with the number of tags. The simulation result demonstrates that the system efficience of GSRA algorithm achieve 240% in Collision Tree (CT) algorithm and 20% with respect to the rate of tag migration. © 2016, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：594 / 599
页数：5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Wong C.P., Feng Q., Grouping based bit-slot aloha protocol for tag anti-collision in RFID systems, IEEE Communications Letters, 11, 12, pp. 946-948, (2007)
[2]  
Shin J., Jeon B., Yang D., Multiple RFID tags Identification with M-ary query tree scheme, IEEE Communications Letters, 17, 3, pp. 604-607, (2013)
[3]  
Li Q., Liu H., Zhang X., An anti-collision algorithm based on unequal timeslots in radio frequency identification system, Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 33, 11, pp. 2628-2633, (2011)
[4]  
Li Z., Lai S., An anti-collision algorithm based on collided bits indicator in radio frequency identification systems, Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 36, 12, pp. 2842-2847, (2014)
[5]  
Lai Y., Hsiao L., Lin B., Optimal slot assignment for binary tracking tree protocol in RFID tag identification, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 23, 1, pp. 255-268, (2015)
[6]  
Wu H., Yu Z., Passive RFID tag anticollision algorithm for capture effect, IEEE Sensors Journal, 15, 1, pp. 218-226, (2015)
[7]  
Landaluce H., Perallos A., Bengtsson L., Et al., Simplified computation in memoryless anticollision RFID identification protocols, Electronics Letters, 50, 17, pp. 1250-1252, (2014)
[8]  
Law C., Lee K., Siu K., Efficient memoryless protocol for tag identification, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications, pp. 75-84, (2000)
[9]  
Li B., Wang J., Efficient anti-collision algorithm utilizing the capture effect for ISO 18000-6C RFID protocol, IEEE Communications Letters, 15, 3, pp. 352-354, (2011)
[10]  
Shin W., Kim J., A capture-aware access control method for enhanced RFID anti-collision performance, IEEE Communications Letters, 13, 5, pp. 354-356, (2009)
12