Integrated Demand Response Optimization Incentive Strategy Considering Users’ Response Characteristics

被引：0

作者：

Sun Y. ^{[1
]}

Hu Y. ^{[1
]}

Zheng S. ^{[1
]}

Li B. ^{[1
]}

Qi B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing

来源：

Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering | 2022年 / 42卷 / 04期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Energy hub; Incentive strategy; Integrated demand response; Integrated energy service provider; Response characteristics;

D O I：

10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.202244

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

With the continuous interaction and integration of multiple energy systems and the reform of energy trading marketization, traditional power demand response can no longer meet the business needs of multi-energy coupling. Aiming at the joint response problem of multiple energy sources, this paper proposed an integrated demand response optimization incentive model considering the user response characteristics. Taking the integrated energy service providers and multiple users as the participants of the integrated demand response, the response strategy can be solved with the optimal objectives of all parties. Firstly, the implementation framework of integrated demand response and the model of electricity-heat-gas energy hub were introduced. Secondly, the collaborative optimization strategy of integrated demand response of integrated energy service providers and users was established, and the existence and uniqueness of the optimal solution were proved. Finally, the analysis of calculation examples verified that the proposed strategy can reduce the response cost of integrated energy service providers and user dissatisfaction in multiple scenarios. © 2022 Chin. Soc. for Elec. Eng.

引用

页码：1402 / 1412

页数：10

共 29 条

[1]

WANG Dongxiao, QIU Jing, MENG Ke, Et al., Coordinated expansion co-planning of integrated gas and power systems, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 5, 3, pp. 314-325, (2017)

[2]

YANG Zheng, PENG Sicheng, LIAO Qingfen, Et al., Non-cooperative trading method for three market entities in integrated community energy system, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 42, 14, pp. 32-39, (2018)

[3]

LI Peng, MA Xiyuan, GUO Zuogang, Et al., Game strategy of integrated energy service providers based on Bi-Level optimization, Power System Technology, 45, 2, pp. 460-473, (2021)

[4]

DENG Tingting, LOU Suhua, TIAN Xu, Et al., Optimal dispatch of power system integrated with wind power considering demand response and deep peak regulation of thermal power units, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 43, 15, pp. 34-41, (2019)

[5]

CUI Yang, ZHANG Huiquan, ZHONG Wuzhi, Et al., Day-ahead scheduling considering participation of price-based demand response and CSP plant in wind power accommodation, Power System Technology, 44, 1, pp. 183-191, (2020)

[6]

SHEIKHI A, BAHRAMI S, RANJBAR A M., An autonomous demand response program for electricity and natural gas networks in smart energy hubs, Energy, 89, pp. 490-499, (2015)

[7]

JIANG Yuechun, ZENG Chengyu, HUAN Jiajia, Et al., Multi-agent interest balance optimization scheduling of integrated energy based on improved NSGA-II, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 40, 7, pp. 17-23, (2020)

[8]

CHEN Yonglong, ZHU Jinda, YANG Dongmei, Et al., Research on economic optimization operation technology of Park-level integrated energy system based on multi-party interest game, High Voltage Engineering, 47, 1, pp. 102-110, (2021)

[9]

HU Peng, AI Xin, ZHANG Shuo, Et al., Modelling and simulation study of TOU stackelberg game based on demand response, Power System Technology, 44, 2, pp. 585-592, (2020)

[10]

ZHANG Xiaping, SHAHIDEHPOUR M, ALABDULWAHAB A, Et al., Hourly electricity demand response in the stochastic day-ahead scheduling of coordinated electricity and natural gas networks, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31, 1, pp. 592-601, (2016)

← 1 2 3 →