Evaluation of lesion detectability in positron emission tomography when using a convergent penalized likelihood image reconstruction method

被引：32

作者：

Wangerin K.A. ^{[1
,2
]}

Ahn S. ^{[1
]}

Wollenweber S. ^{[3
]}

Ross S.G. ^{[3
]}

Kinahan P.E. ^{[2
,4
]}

Manjeshwar R.M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] General Electric Global Research Center, 1 Research Circle, Niskayuna, 12309, NY

[2] University of Washington, Department of Bioengineering, 3720 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, 98195, WA

[3] General Electric Healthcare, 3000 North Grandview Boulevard, Waukesha, 53188, WI

[4] University of Washington, Department of Radiology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, 98195, WA

来源：

Journal of Medical Imaging | 2017年 / 4卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

lesion detection; maximum likelihood; model observers; penalized likelihood; positron emission tomography imaging;

D O I：

10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.011002

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

We have previously developed a convergent penalized likelihood (PL) image reconstruction algorithm using the relative difference prior (RDP) and showed that it achieves more accurate lesion quantitation compared to ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM). We evaluated the detectability of low-contrast liver and lung lesions using the PL-RDP algorithm compared to OSEM. We performed a two-alternative forced choice study using a channelized Hotelling observer model that was previously validated against human observers. Lesion detectability showed a stronger dependence on lesion size for PL-RDP than OSEM. Lesion detectability was improved using time-of-flight (TOF) reconstruction, with greater benefit for the liver compared to the lung and with increasing benefit for decreasing lesion size and contrast. PL detectability was statistically significantly higher than OSEM for 20 mm liver lesions when contrast was ≥0.5 (p<0.05), and TOF PL detectability was statistically significantly higher than TOF OSEM for 15 and 20 mm liver lesions with contrast ≥0.5 and ≥0.25, respectively. For all other cases, there was no statistically significant difference between PL and OSEM (p>0.05). For the range of studied lesion properties, lesion detectability using PL-RDP was equivalent or improved compared to using OSEM. © 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

引用

共 51 条

[1]

Hudson H.M., Larkin R.S., Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 13, 4, pp. 601-609, (1994)

[2]

Qi J., Leahy R.M., Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography, Phys. Med. Biol., 51, pp. R541-R578, (2006)

[3]

Fessler J.A., Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): Applications to tomography, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 5, 3, pp. 493-506, (1996)

[4]

Fessler J.A., Rogers W.L., Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: Space-invariant tomographs, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 5, 9, pp. 1346-1358, (1996)

[5]

Qi J., Leahy R.M., Resolution and noise properties of map reconstruction for fully 3-D PET, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 19, 5, pp. 493-506, (2000)

[6]

Ahn S., Leahy R.M., Analysis of resolution and noise properties of nonquadratically regularized image reconstruction methods for PET, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 27, 3, pp. 413-424, (2008)

[7]

Dutta J., Ahn S., Li Q., Quantitative statistical methods for image quality assessment, Theranostics, 3, 10, pp. 741-756, (2013)

[8]

Qi J., Analysis of lesion detectability in Bayesian emission reconstruction with nonstationary object variability, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 23, 3, pp. 321-329, (2004)

[9]

Qi J., Huesman R.H., Penalized maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for lesion detection, Phys. Med. Biol., 51, 16, pp. 4017-4029, (2006)

[10]

Qi J., Huesman R.H., Theoretical study of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for region of interest quantification, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 25, 5, pp. 640-648, (2006)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →