Transformation in Healthcare by Wearable Devices for Diagnostics and Guidance of Treatment

被引：16

作者：

Mahajan A. ^{[1
]}

Pottie G. ^{[2
]}

Kaiser W. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh

[2] University of California, Los Angeles

来源：

ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare | 2020年 / 1卷 / 01期

关键词：

Machine learning; wearable monitoring;

D O I：

10.1145/3361561

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Wearable devices offer a promise of immense impact on worldwide global health by offering the potential for non-invasive, constantly vigilant, and low-cost monitoring of individual condition and fundamental advances in guiding healthcare. The urgency of this objective for its individual and societal benefits will attract an expanding community of researchers from backgrounds in nearly every field of computing. This article describes the unprecedented benefits and opportunities for computing research in wearable devices and the multidisciplinary challenges that have not been encountered individually or combined together in previous research. This article is focused on providing guidance to the new community of healthcare in computing researchers who will both create a new field and forge transformative solutions for healthcare delivery to a worldwide population. © 2020 ACM.

引用

共 25 条

[1]

Barrett P.M., Komatiredd R., Haaser S., Topol S., Sheard J., Encinas J., Fought A.J., Topol E.J., Comparison of 24-hour holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring, American Journal of Medicine, 127, 1, pp. 95e11-95e95e17, (2013)

[2]

Baumgartner H., Hung J., Bermejo J., Chambers J.B., Edvardsen T., Goldstein S., Lancellotti P., LeFevre M., Miller F., Otto C.M., Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: A focused update from the european association of cardiovascular imaging and the American society of echocardiography, European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging, 18, 3, pp. 254-275, (2017)

[3]

Bland J.M., Altman D.G., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, 1, pp. 307-310, (1986)

[4]

Bland J.M., Altman D.G., Measuring agreement in method comparison studies, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, pp. 135-160, (1999)

[5]

Cannesson M., Mahajan A., Anesthesiology and new models of perioperative care: What will help move the needle?, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 124, 5, pp. 1392-1393, (2017)

[6]

Cohen I.G., Mello M.M., Hipaa and protecting health information in the 21st century, Journal of the American Medical Association, 320, 3, pp. 231-232, (2018)

[7]

Darwiche A., Human-level intelligence or animal-like abilities?, Communications of the ACM, 61, 10, pp. 56-67, (2018)

[8]

Daskivich T.J., Houman J., Lopez M., Luu M., Fleshner P., Zaghiyan K., Cunneen S., Association of wearable activity monitors with assessment of daily ambulation and length of stay among patients undergoing major surgery, Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open, 2, 2, (2019)

[9]

Gharehbaghi A., Ask P., Nylander E., Janerot-Sjoberg B., Ekman I., Linden M., Babic A., A hybrid model for diagnosing sever [sic] aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients using phonocardiogram, World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, pp. 7-12, (2015)

[10]

Gostin L.O., Halabi S.F., Wilson K., Health data and privacy in the digital era, Journal of the American Medical Association, 320, 3, pp. 233-234, (2018)

← 1 2 3 →