Aerial and underwater sound of unmanned aerial vehicles (Uav)

被引:29
作者
Erbe C. [1 ]
Parsons M. [1 ]
Duncan A. [1 ]
Osterrieder S.K. [1 ]
Allen K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Marine Science & Technology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, 6845, WA
关键词
Drone; Noise; Noise impact; Source level; UAV; Underwater noise;
D O I
10.1139/juvs-2016-0018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unmanned aerial vehicles/systems (UAV/UAS, drones) are increasingly being used for terrestrial and marine ecological surveying and research. Studies on the potential disturbance of fauna by UAVs have been sparse, with most reports on the behavioral responses of birds. Responses of marine mammals have been reported in the case of pin-nipeds on land, with very limited information on marine mammals at sea. Whether the stimulus was visual (the UAV or its shadow) or acoustic (noise) is unknown. While UAV technology is developing fast, guidelines for the responsible use of UAVs around fauna are lagging behind. We recorded aerial and underwater sound from four aerial drones in different environments. Sound spectra exhibited distinct tones <2 kHz. Median broad-band source levels were 77–89 dB re 20 μPa rms at 1 m in air. Under water, median broad-band received levels were <100 dB re 1 μPa rms varying with drone altitude, flight mode, and recorder depth. Drone power spectral density exceeded underwater ambient levels by up to 30 dB between 100 and 10 000 Hz. Drone levels were well below those commonly considered in underwater noise regulations. Simple sound propagation and transmission calculations predicted underwater levels within −3.2 to +6.2 dB of measured levels. © 2017, Canadian Science Publishing. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 101
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Anderson K., Gaston K.J., Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology, Front. Ecol. Environ., 11, 3, pp. 138-146, (2013)
  • [2] Blackwell S.B., Greene C.R., Acoustic measurements in Cook Inlet, Alaska, during August 2001: Report for National Marine Fisheries Service under Contract No, 40HANF100123, (2003)
  • [3] Chabot D., Bird D.M., Wildlife research and management methods in the 21st century: Where do unmanned aircraft fit in?, J. Unmanned Veh. Syst., 3, pp. 137-155, (2015)
  • [4] Christiansen F., Rojano-Donate L., Madsen P.T., Bejder L., Noise levels of multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles with implications for potential underwater impacts on marine mammals. Front, Mar. Sci., 3, 277, (2016)
  • [5] Ditmer M.A., Vincent J.B., Werden L.K., Tanner J.C., Laske T.G., Iaizzo P.A., Garshelis D.L., Fieberg J.R., Bears show a physiological but limited behavioral response to unmanned aerial vehicles, Curr. Biol., 25, 17, pp. 2278-2283, (2015)
  • [6] Dulava S., Bean W.T., Richmond O.M.W., Environmental reviews and case studies: Applications of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for waterbird surveys, Environ. Pract., 17, 3, pp. 201-210, (2015)
  • [7] Erbe C., The Effects of Underwater Noise on Marine Mammals. the Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, (2012)
  • [8] Erbe C., International regulation of underwater noise, Acoust. Aust., 41, 1, pp. 12-19, (2013)
  • [9] Comparative Hearing: Fish and Amphibians, (1999)
  • [10] Goebel M.E., Perryman W.L., Hinke J.T., Krause D., Hann N.A., Gardner S., Leroi D.J., A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators, Polar Biol, 38, 5, pp. 619-630, (2015)