Fuzzy logic algorithm of hovering control for the quadrotor unmanned aerial system

被引：2
作者：
Yu L. [1 ]
Chen J. [1 ]
Tian Y. [1 ]
Sun Y. [1 ]
Ding L. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan
[2] School of Information and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan
来源：
Yu, Lie (lyu@wtu.edu.cn) | 2017年 / Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.卷 / 10期
关键词：
Fuzzy logic algorithm; Hovering control; Position tracking control; Unmanned aerial systems; Velocity tracking control;
D O I：
10.1108/IJICC-02-2017-0009
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a control strategy which uses two independent PID controllers to realize the hovering control for unmanned aerial systems (UASs). In addition, the aim of using two PID controller is to achieve the position control and velocity control simultaneously. Design/methodology/approach: The dynamic of the UASs is mathematically modeled. One PID controller is used for position tracking control, while the other is selected for the vertical component of velocity tracking control. Meanwhile, fuzzy logic algorithm is presented to use the actual horizontal component of velocity to compute the desired position. Findings: Based on this fuzzy logic algorithm, the control error of the horizontal component of velocity tracking control is narrowed gradually to be zero. The results show that the fuzzy logic algorithm can make the UASs hover still in the air and vertical to the ground. Social implications: The acquired results are based on simulation not experiment. Originality/value: This is the first study to use two independent PID controllers to realize stable hovering control for UAS. It is also the first to use the velocity of the UAS to calculate the desired position. © 2017, © Emerald Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码：451 / 463
页数：12
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Bergamasco M., Lovera M., Identification of linear models for the dynamics of a hovering quadrotor, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 22, 5, pp. 1696-1707, (2014)
  • [2] Bertran E., Sanchez-Cerda A., On the tradeoff vetween electrical power consumption and flight performance in fixed-wing UAV autopilots, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 56, 11, pp. 8832-8840, (2016)
  • [3] Cao N., Lynch A.F., Inner-outer loop control for quadrotor UAVs with input and state constraints, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 24, 5, pp. 1797-1804, (2016)
  • [4] Chen Y.M., Chang S.H., An agent-based simulation for multi-UAVs coordinative sensing, International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 1, 2, pp. 269-284, (2008)
  • [5] Dierks T., Jagannathan S., Output feedback control of a quadrotor UAV using neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 21, 1, pp. 50-66, (2010)
  • [6] Ding X., Yu Y., Motion planning and stabilization control of a multipropeller multifunction aerial robot, IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, 18, 2, pp. 645-656, (2013)
  • [7] Dydek Z.T., Annaswamy A.M., Lavretsky E., Adaptive control of quadrotor UAVs: a design trade study with flight evaluations, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21, 4, pp. 1400-1406, (2013)
  • [8] Kang Y., Hedrick J.K., Linear tracking for a fixed-wing UAV using nonlinear model predictive control, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 17, 5, pp. 1202-1210, (2009)
  • [9] Lee D., Franchi A., Son H.I., Ha C., Bulthoff H.H., Giordano P.R., Semiautonomous haptic teleoperation control architecture of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, 18, 4, pp. 1334-1345, (2013)
  • [10] Lee K.U., Kim H.S., Park J.B., Choi Y.H., Hovering control of a quadrotor, pp. 162-167, (2012)
12