Compatibility measurement-based group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations

被引：2

作者：

Zhang X.-Y. ^{[1
]}

Wang Z.J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Information, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang

来源：

Zhang, Xue-Yang (zhangxueyang@zufe.edu.cn) | 1600年 / SAGE Publications Inc.卷 / 11期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Aggregation; Compatibility; Consensus; Group decision making; Interval fuzzy preference relation;

D O I：

10.1177/1748301816665022

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In this paper, we put forward a ratio-based compatibility degree between any two ]0,1[-valued interval numbers to measure how proximate they approach to each other. A compatibility measurement is presented to evaluate the compatibility degree between a pair of ]0,1[-valued interval fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs). By employing the geometric mean, a measurement formula is proposed to calculate how close one interval fuzzy preference relation is to all the other interval fuzzy preference relations in a group. We devise an induced interval fuzzy ordered weighted geometric (IIFOWG) operator to aggregate ]0,1[-valued interval numbers, and apply the induced interval fuzzy ordered weighted geometric operator to fuse interval fuzzy preference relations into a collective one. Based on the compatibility measurement between two interval fuzzy preference relations, a notion of acceptable consensus of interval fuzzy preference relations is introduced to check the consensus level between an individual interval fuzzy preference relation and a collective interval fuzzy preference relation, and a novel procedure is developed to handle group decision-making problems with interval fuzzy preference relations. A numerical example with respect to the evaluation of e-commerce websites is provided to illustrate the proposed procedure. © The Author(s) 2016.

引用

页码：31 / 39

页数：8

共 25 条

[1]

Satty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, (1980)

[2]

Orlovski S.A., Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation, Fuzzy Sets Syst, 1, pp. 155-167, (1978)

[3]

Xu Z., On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices, Fuzzy Optim Decis Ma, 3, pp. 217-225, (2004)

[4]

Xu Z.A., Survey of preference relations, Int J Gen Syst, 36, pp. 179-203, (2007)

[5]

Zs X., Chen J., Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations, Eur J Oper Res, 184, pp. 266-280, (2008)

[6]

Wang Z.J., Li K.W., Goal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relations, Inform Sci, 193, pp. 180-198, (2012)

[7]

Hu M.M., Ren P.Y., Lan J.B., Et al., Note on ‘‘Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations, ’’. Eur J Oper Res, 237, pp. 771-773, (2014)

[8]

Wang Z.J., A note on ‘‘Incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications, ’’. Comput Ind Eng, 77, pp. 65-69, (2014)

[9]

Wang Z.J., Chen Y.G., Logarithmic least squares prioritization and completion methods for interval fuzzy preference relations on geometric transitivity, Inform Sci, 28, pp. 59-75, (2014)

[10]

Liu F., Zhang W.G., TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations, IEEE Transac Cybernet, 44, pp. 1283-1294, (2014)

← 1 2 3 →