A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university

被引:0
作者
Zhai C. [1 ]
Wibowo S. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Brisbane
[2] School of Engineering and Technology, CQUniversity Australia, 120 Spencer Street, Melbourne, 3000, VIC
来源
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence | 2023年 / 4卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Dialogue system; Foreign language learning; Interactional competence; University education;
D O I
10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous studies demonstrate that the use of artificial intelligence (AI) dialogue systems for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education has effectively improved university students' reading, writing, and listening abilities. However, there are limited systematic reviews focused on the evidence-based interactional competence of EFL university students. This study aims to examine the use of AI dialogue systems to enhance EFL university students' interactional competence. Through the PRISMA process, this study identified 28 articles published between January 2013 and August 2022 in journals and conferences from the most popular databases, including Google Scholar, ProQuest, IEEE, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. The systematic review identified six dimensions and 25 sub-dimensions that influence the application of AI dialogue systems for EFL learning. The six dimensions include technological integration, task designs, students’ engagement, learning objectives, technological limitations, and the novelty effect. Gaps are identified that (1) components of debate and problem-solving skills in EF acquisition in university education seemed to be overlooked in the AI dialogue system design, and (2) the importance of embedding culture, humor and empathy functions were not taken into consideration in the AI dialogue system. This study finds that the development and implementation of an AI dialogue system in EFL is still in its infancy stage. Future research should emphasize meaning-based communication, intelligibility in language competency, debate, and problem-solving skills in university education. © 2023 The Author
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 168 条
[1]  
Adenle Y.A., Chan E.H., Sun Y., Chau C., Exploring the coverage of environmental-dimension indicators in existing campus sustainability appraisal tools, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8, (2020)
[2]  
Al Braiki B., Harous S., Zaki N., Alnajjar F., Artificial intelligence in education and assessment methods, Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9, 5, pp. 1998-2007, (2020)
[3]  
Al-Oqaily E.I., Salam A.R.H., Na K.S., The use of blackboard in the practice of English-Speaking skills among Saudi EFL learners during COVID-19, Arab World English Journal, (2022)
[4]  
Alsadoon R., Chatting with AI bot: Vocabulary learning assistant for Saudi EFL learners, English Language Teaching, 14, 6, pp. 135-157, (2021)
[5]  
An Z., Gan Z., Wang C., Profiling Chinese EFL students' technology-based self-regulated English learning strategies, PLoS One, 15, 10, (2020)
[6]  
Arung F., Rafli Z., Dewanti R., A new substantive theory for the mastery of foreign language speaking skills: A grounded research, (2019)
[7]  
Ayedoun E., Hayashi Y., Seta K., Adding communicative and affective strategies to an embodied conversational agent to enhance second language learners' willingness to communicate, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29, 1, pp. 29-57, (2019)
[8]  
Ayedoun E., Hayashi Y., Seta K., Toward personalized scaffolding and fading of motivational support in L2 learner–dialogue agent interactions: An exploratory study, IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 13, 3, pp. 604-616, (2020)
[9]  
Azman N., Shin L.K., Problem-based learning in English for a second language classroom: Students' perspectives, International Journal of Learning, 18, 6, (2012)
[10]  
Baker R.S., D'Mello S.K., Rodrigo M.M.T., Graesser A.C., Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 4, pp. 223-241, (2010)