Applying usability methods to identify health literacy issues: An example using a personal health record

被引:15
作者
Monkman, Helen [1 ]
Kushniruk, Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC
关键词
health literacy; heuristic evaluation; Personal Health Record (PHR); usability testing;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-61499-203-5-179
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The prevalence of consumer health information systems is increasing. However, usability and health literacy impact both the value and adoption of these systems. Health literacy and usability are closely related in that systems may not be used accurately if users cannot understand the information therein. Thus, it is imperative to focus on mitigating the demands on health literacy in consumer health information systems. This study modified two usability evaluation methods (heuristic evaluation and usability testing) to incorporate the identification of potential health literacy issues in a Personal Health Record (PHR). Heuristic evaluation is an analysis of a system performed by a usability specialist who evaluates how well the system abides by usability principles. In contrast, a usability test involves a post hoc analysis of a representative user interacting with the system. These two methods revealed several health literacy issues and suggestions to ameliorate them were made. Thus, it was demonstrated that usability methods could be successfully augmented for the purpose of investigating health literacy issues. To improve users' health knowledge, the adoption of consumer health information systems, and the accuracy of the information contained therein, it is encouraged that usability methods be applied with an added focus on health literacy. © 2013 ITCH 2013 Steering Committee and IOS Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 185
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Tang P.C., Ash J.S., Bates D.W., Overhage J.M., Sands D.Z., Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 13, 2, pp. 121-126, (2006)
  • [2] Jones D.A., Shipman J.P., Plaut D.A., Selden C.R., Characteristics of personal health records: Findings of the medical library association/national library of medicine joint electronic personal health record task force, Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 98, 3, pp. 243-249, (2010)
  • [3] Segall N., Saville J.G., L'Engle P., Carlson B., Wright M.C., Schulman K., Tcheng J.E., Usability evaluation of a personal health record, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, pp. 1233-1242, (2011)
  • [4] Wuerdeman L., Volk L., Pizziferri L., Tsurikova R., Et al., How accurate is information that patients contribute to their electronic health record?, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, pp. 834-838, (2011)
  • [5] Ratzan S.C., Parker R.M., Introduction, (2000)
  • [6] Cutilli C.C., Health literacy: What you need to know, Orthopaedic Nursing / National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses, 24, 3, pp. 227-233, (2005)
  • [7] Speros C., Health literacy: Concept analysis, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50, 6, pp. 633-640, (2005)
  • [8] Kushniruk A.W., Patel V.L., Cognitive And usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37, 1, pp. 56-76, (2004)
  • [9] Kim M.I., Johnson K.B., Personal health records: Evaluation of functionality and utility, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 9, 2, pp. 171-180, (2002)
  • [10] Cimino J.J., Patel V.L., Kushniruk A.W., The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): Technical solutions for and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical records, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 68, 1-3, pp. 113-127, (2002)