Study on how to select appropriate design methods for product platform and family design

被引:0
作者
Nomaguchi, Yutaka [1 ]
Askhøj, Anders [1 ]
Madsen, Kristian F. [1 ]
Fujita, Kikuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871
来源
Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, C Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C | 2013年 / 79卷 / 799期
关键词
Design engineering; Design method; Product architecture; Product design; Product development management; Product family; Product platform;
D O I
10.1299/kikaic.79.866
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the need for product platform and product family has increased over the last 20 years, research within the area has led to the development of various methods that aim at evaluating a candidate of design. Although their differences are considered a strong point of the theoretical field, the large variety can end up complicating the selection process, which will result in choosing less optimal methods for a specific design case. This paper surveys prior works of design methods for product platform and product family, and proposes Design Method Selection Matrix (DMSM) that can help designers choose appropriate design methods. The underlying basis for the proposed DMSM is to determine methods appropriateness based on the availability of information, which is defined by the situation in which the product development project takes place, as well as the importance of information, which is determined by the goal of the project. The output of DMSM is a score for each of the identified methods that represent the appropriateness of the given method, based on the situation and goal(s) chosen by the designer. Suggestions are based on parameters that can easily be determined by designers without extensive experience within platform based product design. The case study demonstrates the effectiveness of DMSM. © 2013 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 879
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Simpson T.W., Siddique Z., Jiao J., Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, (2005)
[2]  
Jiao J., Simpson T.W., Siddique Z., Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-The-art review, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18, 1, pp. 5-29, (2007)
[3]  
Otto K., Holtta-Otto K., A multi-criteria assessment tool for screening preliminary product platform concepts, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18, 1, pp. 59-75, (2007)
[4]  
Ulrich K.T., Eppinger S.D., Product Design and Development, (2008)
[5]  
Fellini R., Kokkolaras M., Papalambros P., Perez-Duarte A., Platform selection under performance bounds in optimal design of product families, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 127, 4, pp. 524-535, (2005)
[6]  
Thevenot H., Simpson T.W., Commonality Indices for product family design: A detailed comparison, Journal of Engineering Design, 17, 2, pp. 99-119, (2006)
[7]  
Simpson T.W., Maier J.R.A., Mistree F., Product platform design: Method and application, Research in Engineering Design, 13, 1, pp. 2-22, (2001)
[8]  
Sanderson S., Uzumeri M., Managing product families: The case of the sony walkman, Research Policy, 24, 5, pp. 761-782, (1995)
[9]  
Pessina M.W., Renner J.R., Mass customization at lutron electronics: A total company process, Agility and Global Competition, 2, 1, pp. 50-57, (1998)
[10]  
Simpson T.W., Product platform design and customization: Status and promise, Aritificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 18, 1, pp. 3-20, (2004)