Evaluation of PCR-enhancing approaches to reduce inhibition in wastewater samples and enhance viral load measurements

被引:3
作者
Zafeiriadou, Anastasia [1 ]
Nano, Konstantina [1 ]
Thomaidis, Nikolaos S. [1 ]
Markou, Athina [1 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Zografou, Athens
关键词
PCR enhancers; PCR inhibitors; T4; gene; 32; protein; Viruses; Wastewater;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176768
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Molecular-based assays are the most commonly used methods for the detection and quantification of viruses in wastewater. The variety of inhibitory substances present in the complex matrix of wastewater hinders downstream analysis and often leads to false negative results and underestimation of viral load. The development of robust and inhibitor-tolerant detection methods is necessary in the context of wastewater-based epidemiology, a valuable tool that has gained further importance since the emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic. Various strategies are used to mitigate inhibition in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the most prevalent of all: the dilution of the sample and the inhibitor removal kits. In this study, we first indicated the presence of inhibitors in wastewater samples and the evaluation of eight different PCR enhancing strategies were further performed using reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) protocol. False negative results were eliminated through four approaches evaluated, a 10-fold dilution of the extracted sample, addition of T4 gene 32 protein (gp32), addition of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), and using an inhibitor removal kit. Among the methods that removed inhibition, the most significant for the removal of inhibition was the addition of gp32 (at a final concentration 0.2 μg/μl). This optimized protocol was further applied to wastewater samples tested for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and a direct comparison study was further performed with reverse-transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR). The detection frequency of both methods was 100 % and the obtained viral concentrations were higher by RT-ddPCR; the optimized RT-qPCR assay showed a good correlation (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: 0,713, p-value <0,007) with RT-ddPCR. This is the first study to directly compare common strategies for eliminating inhibition in wastewater and demonstrates the importance of developing robust assays to accurately assess the recovery rates and viral loads of the targets tested, in a simple, cost-effective and high-throughput manner. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abu Al-Soud W., Radstrom P., Effects of amplification facilitators on diagnostic PCR in the presence of blood, feces, and meat, J. Clin. Microbiol., 38, pp. 4463-4470, (2000)
[2]  
Ahmed W., Angel N., Edson J., Bibby K., Bivins A., O'Brien J.W., Choi P.M., Kitajima M., Simpson S.L., Li J., Tscharke B., Verhagen R., Smith W.J.M., Zaugg J., Dierens L., Hugenholtz P., Thomas K.V., Mueller J.F., First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: a proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community, Sci. Total Environ., 728, (2020)
[3]  
Ahmed W., Bivins A., Bertsch P.M., Bibby K., Choi P.M., Farkas K., Gyawali P., Hamilton K.A., Haramoto E., Kitajima M., Simpson S.L., Tandukar S., Thomas K.V., Mueller J.F., Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater: Methods Optimization and Quality Control Are Crucial for Generating Reliable Public Health Information, (2020)
[4]  
Ahmed W., Simpson S.L., Bertsch P.M., Bibby K., Bivins A., Blackall L.L., Bofill-Mas S., Bosch A., Brandao J., Choi P.M., Ciesielski M., Donner E., D'Souza N., Farnleitner A.H., Gerrity D., Gonzalez R., Griffith J.F., Gyawali P., Haas C.N., Hamilton K.A., Hapuarachchi H.C., Harwood V.J., Haque R., Jackson G., Khan S.J., Khan W., Kitajima M., Korajkic A., La Rosa G., Layton B.A., Lipp E., McLellan S.L., McMinn B., Medema G., Metcalfe S., Meijer W.G., Mueller J.F., Murphy H., Naughton C.C., Noble
[5]  
Al-Soud W.A., Radstrom P., Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-inhibiting samples, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, pp. 3748-3753, (1998)
[6]  
Barcelo D., Wastewater-based epidemiology to monitor COVID-19 outbreak: present and future diagnostic methods to be in your radar, Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., 2, (2020)
[7]  
Boehm A.B., Hughes B., Duong D., Chan-Herur V., Buchman A., Wolfe M.K., White B.J., Wastewater concentrations of human influenza, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, and seasonal coronavirus nucleic-acids during the COVID-19 pandemic: a surveillance study, The Lancet Microbe, 4, pp. e340-e348, (2023)
[8]  
Bofill-Mas S., Rusinol M., Recent trends on methods for the concentration of viruses from water samples, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal., 16, pp. 7-13, (2020)
[9]  
Cao Y., Raith M.R., Griffith J.F., Droplet digital PCR for simultaneous quantification of general and human-associated fecal indicators for water quality assessment, Water Res., 70, pp. 337-349, (2015)
[10]  
D'Aoust P.M., Mercier E., Montpetit D., Jia J.J., Alexandrov I., Neault N., Baig A.T., Mayne J., Zhang X., Alain T., Langlois M.A., Servos M.R., MacKenzie M., Figeys D., MacKenzie A.E., Graber T.E., Delatolla R., Quantitative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from wastewater solids in communities with low COVID-19 incidence and prevalence, Water Res., 188, (2021)