Voltage Control of Microgrid Inverter Based on Improved Second-order Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control

被引:0
作者
Yang L. [1 ]
Zeng J. [1 ]
Ma W. [1 ]
Huang Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou
来源
Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems | 2019年 / 43卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Extended state observer (ESO); Frequency domain analysis; Lead-lag; Linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC); Microgrid inverter; Stability analysis;
D O I
10.7500/AEPS20180419002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The microgrid inverter system is characterized by nonlinearity, strong coupling, violent disturbance and flexible switching mode. It is not easy to meet requirements through conventional dual loop control. As for the active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), all uncertainties of the system are regarded as total disturbances, which will be estimated and compensated dynamically. As a result, the complex system can be corrected to integral series type to achieve expected control performance. With the adoption of linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) technology with more engineering application value, this paper designs a second-order LADRC controller which takes the output voltage and its differential as state variables. Considering that the extended state observer (ESO) is the core of LADRC, the output voltage error derivative term is introduced to improve the observation capability of ESO. Further, a first-order inertial link is embedded into the total perturbation channel to avoid increasing observation noise. Frequency response characteristics of LADRC and typical dual loop control system show that the improved LADRC has a better disturbance rejection performance than the other two. Simulation and experimental results further prove the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. ©2019 Automation of Electric Power Systems Press.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 153
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Olivares D.E., Mehrizi-Sani A., Etemadi A.H., Et al., Trends in microgrid control, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5, 4, pp. 1905-1919, (2014)
[2]  
Wang C., Li P., Development and challenges of distributed generation, the micro-grid and smart distribution system, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 34, 2, pp. 10-14, (2010)
[3]  
Liu N., Wang J., Wang L., Distributed energy management for interconnected operation of combined heat and power-based microgrids with demand response, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 5, 3, pp. 478-488, (2017)
[4]  
Zeng Z., Li H., Ran L., Comparison on control strategies of inverters in AC microgrids, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 40, 9, pp. 142-151, (2016)
[5]  
Guo Q., Lin L., Wu H., Et al., An improved droop control strategy for accurate reactive power sharing among distributed generators, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 39, 15, pp. 30-34, (2015)
[6]  
Shuai Z., Mo S., Wang J., Et al., Droop control method for load share and voltage regulation in high-voltage microgrids, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 4, 1, pp. 76-86, (2016)
[7]  
Oureilidis K.O., Bakirtzis E.A., Demoulias C.S., Frequency-based control of islanded microgrid with renewable energy sources and energy storage, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 4, 1, pp. 54-62, (2016)
[8]  
Shi R., Zhang X., Hu C., Et al., Self-tuning virtual synchronous generator control for improving frequency stability in autonomous photovoltaic-diesel microgrids, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 6, 3, pp. 482-494, (2018)
[9]  
Liu J., Miura Y., Ise T., Comparison of dynamic characteristics between virtual synchronous generator and droop control in inverter-based distributed generators, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 31, 5, pp. 3600-3611, (2016)
[10]  
Zhao Y., Chai J., Wang S., Et al., Instantaneous power calculation based on intrinsic frequency of single-phase virtual synchronous generator, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 5, 6, pp. 970-978, (2017)