Numerical study on efficiency and applicability of prefabricated modular ground heat exchangers in shallow depth

被引:1
作者
Chae, Hobyung [1 ]
Nam, Yujin [2 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Res Inst Ind Technol, Busan 46241, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Busan 46241, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Modular ground heat exchangers; Prefabrication technology; Ground source heat pump system; Performance analysis; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; ENERGY; PUMPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2024.121857
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study developed and validated a CFD model to evaluate the performance of modular ground heat exchangers (GHEs) compared to vertical closed-loop GHEs. The reliability of the model was confirmed through comparison with field experiment data, with RMSE values of 0.35 degrees C and 0.27 degrees C for inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively. Additionally, the performance of modular GHEs installed at shallow depths was evaluated under various external environmental conditions, revealing a temperature difference of approximately 7 degrees C between the intermediate and cooling periods. A comparison of the performance of modular and vertical GHEs of the same heat exchanger length showed that, when a constant heat load of 2 kW was maintained for 100 h, the temperature in the vertical GHE increased to 32.8 degrees C, while the modular GHE reached 38.5 degrees C. Despite the high thermal conductivity resulting from ground heat storage effects, the modular GHE exhibited a greater temperature increase due to its shallow installation depth compared to the vertical GHE. On the other hand, as the thermal conductivity of the ground decreased, the temperature difference between the two systems also decreased. These results suggest that modular GHEs can be a cost-effective and efficient solution, particularly in regions with low ground thermal conductivity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ASHRAE Handbook
[2]   Energy and geotechnical behaviour of energy piles for different design solutions [J].
Batini, Niccolo ;
Rotta Loria, Alessandro F. ;
Conti, Paolo ;
Testi, Daniele ;
Grassi, Walter ;
Laloui, Lyesse .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 86 :199-213
[3]  
Benyoub M, 2018, ENG TECHNOL APPL SCI, V8, P2715
[4]   Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade [J].
Cao, Xiaodong ;
Dai, Xilei ;
Liu, Junjie .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 128 :198-213
[5]  
Carslaw H., 1959, CONDUCTION HEAT SOLI
[6]   Performance and economic analysis for optimal length of borehole heat exchanger considering effects of groundwater [J].
Chae, Hobyung ;
Bae, Sangmu ;
Jeong, Jae-Weon ;
Nam, Yujin .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 224
[7]   Life cycle cost analysis of ground source heat pump system based on multilayer thermal response test [J].
Chae, Hobyung ;
Nagano, Katsunori ;
Katsura, Takao ;
Sakata, Yoshitaka ;
Serageldin, Ahmed A. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 261
[8]   Estimation of fast groundwater flow velocity from thermal response test results [J].
Chae, Hobyung ;
Nagano, Katsunori ;
Sakata, Yoshitaka ;
Katsura, Takao ;
Kondo, Takeshi .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 206
[9]   Advances in ground heat exchangers for space heating and cooling: Review and perspectives [J].
Cui P. ;
Yang W. ;
Zhang W. ;
Zhu K. ;
Spitler J.D. ;
Yu M. .
Energy and Built Environment, 2024, 5 (02) :255-269
[10]  
Dean Brian, 2016, 2016 Global Status Report: towards Zero-Emission Efficient and Resilient Buildings