Prediction of damage potential in mainshock-aftershock sequences using machine learning algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Zhou [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Meng [3 ]
Han, Miao [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Xiaohui [4 ]
Lu, Dagang [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Multifunct Shaking Tables Lab, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Guilin Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
[5] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, 73 Huanghe Rd, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
machine learning; mainshock-aftershock; damage potential prediction; the high-correlation variables; SDOF systems; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; NONLINEAR RESPONSE; DUCTILITY DEMAND; SEISMIC DAMAGE; SPECTRA; PARAMETERS; RECORDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11803-024-2280-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Assessing the potential damage caused by earthquakes is crucial for a community's emergency response. In this study, four machine learning (ML) methods-random forest, extremely randomized trees, AdaBoost (AB), and gradient boosting (GB)-were employed to develop prediction models for the damage potential of the mainshock (DIMS) and mainshock-aftershock sequences (DIMA). Building structures were modeled using eight single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems with different hysteretic rules. A set of 662 recorded mainshock-aftershock (MS-AS) ground motions was selected from the PEER database. Seven intensity measures (IMs) were chosen to represent the characteristics of the mainshock and aftershock. The results revealed that the selected ML methods can well predict the structural damage potential of the SDOF systems, except for the AB method. The GB model exhibited the best performance, making it the recommended choice for predicting DIMS and DIMA among the four ML models. Additionally, the impact of input variables in the prediction was investigated using the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method. The high-correlation variables were sensitive to the structural period (T). At T=1.0 s, the mainshock peak ground velocity (PGVM) and aftershock peak ground displacement (PGDA) significantly influenced the prediction of DIMA. When T increased to 5.0 s, the primary high-correlation factor of the mainshock IMs changed from PGVM to the mainshock peak ground displacement (PGDM); however, the high-correlation variable of the aftershock IMs remained PGDA. The high-correlation factors for DIMS showed trends similar to those of DIMA. Finally, a table summarizing the first and second high-correlation variables for predicting DIMS and DIMA were provided, offering a valuable reference for parameter selection in seismic damage prediction for mainshock-aftershock sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 938
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The capacity loss of a RCC building under mainshock-aftershock seismic sequences
    Zhai, Chang-Hai
    Zheng, Zhi
    Li, Shuang
    Pan, Xiaolan
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 15 (03) : 295 - 306
  • [32] Seismic performance investigation of high CFRDs subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences
    Pang, Rui
    Xu, Bin
    Zhang, Xu
    Zhou, Yang
    Kong, Xianjing
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 116 : 82 - 85
  • [33] Conditional probability modeling of intensity measures for offshore mainshock-aftershock sequences
    Bai, Xiaoyu
    Jiang, Hui
    Song, Guangsong
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 161
  • [34] Analysis of the Effect of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences on the Fragility of RC Bridge Columns
    Wang, Tongxing
    Han, Qiang
    Wen, Jianian
    Wang, Lihui
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [35] Fragility analysis of a concrete gravity dam under mainshock-aftershock sequences
    Ashna, K. N.
    Maheshwari, Priti
    Viladkar, M. N.
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 61
  • [36] Shake Table Study on the Effect of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences on Structures with SFSI
    Qin, Xiaoyang
    Chouw, Nawawi
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2017, 2017
  • [37] Seismic analyses of a RCC building under mainshock-aftershock seismic sequences
    Zhai, Chang-Hai
    Zheng, Zhi
    Li, Shuang
    Xie, Li-Li
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 74 : 46 - 55
  • [38] Damage spectra for the mainshock-aftershock sequence-type ground motions
    Zhai, Chang-Hai
    Wen, Wei-Ping
    Chen, ZhiQiang
    Li, Shuang
    Xie, Li-Li
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 45 : 1 - 12
  • [39] Damage assessment of single-layer reticulated domes subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences based on structural damage factor
    Huang, He
    Wang, Yifan
    Li, Yugang
    STRUCTURES, 2021, 34 : 604 - 614
  • [40] Damage spectra of the mainshock-aftershock ground motions at soft soil sites
    Wen, Weiping
    Ji, Duofa
    Zhai, Changhai
    Li, Xiulin
    Sun, Pengyu
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 115 : 815 - 825