Prediction of damage potential in mainshock-aftershock sequences using machine learning algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Zhou [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Meng [3 ]
Han, Miao [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Xiaohui [4 ]
Lu, Dagang [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Multifunct Shaking Tables Lab, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Guilin Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
[5] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, 73 Huanghe Rd, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
machine learning; mainshock-aftershock; damage potential prediction; the high-correlation variables; SDOF systems; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; NONLINEAR RESPONSE; DUCTILITY DEMAND; SEISMIC DAMAGE; SPECTRA; PARAMETERS; RECORDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11803-024-2280-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Assessing the potential damage caused by earthquakes is crucial for a community's emergency response. In this study, four machine learning (ML) methods-random forest, extremely randomized trees, AdaBoost (AB), and gradient boosting (GB)-were employed to develop prediction models for the damage potential of the mainshock (DIMS) and mainshock-aftershock sequences (DIMA). Building structures were modeled using eight single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems with different hysteretic rules. A set of 662 recorded mainshock-aftershock (MS-AS) ground motions was selected from the PEER database. Seven intensity measures (IMs) were chosen to represent the characteristics of the mainshock and aftershock. The results revealed that the selected ML methods can well predict the structural damage potential of the SDOF systems, except for the AB method. The GB model exhibited the best performance, making it the recommended choice for predicting DIMS and DIMA among the four ML models. Additionally, the impact of input variables in the prediction was investigated using the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method. The high-correlation variables were sensitive to the structural period (T). At T=1.0 s, the mainshock peak ground velocity (PGVM) and aftershock peak ground displacement (PGDA) significantly influenced the prediction of DIMA. When T increased to 5.0 s, the primary high-correlation factor of the mainshock IMs changed from PGVM to the mainshock peak ground displacement (PGDM); however, the high-correlation variable of the aftershock IMs remained PGDA. The high-correlation factors for DIMS showed trends similar to those of DIMA. Finally, a table summarizing the first and second high-correlation variables for predicting DIMS and DIMA were provided, offering a valuable reference for parameter selection in seismic damage prediction for mainshock-aftershock sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 938
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of damage potential in mainshock–aftershock sequences using machine learning algorithms
    Zhou Zhou
    Wang Meng
    Han Miao
    Yu Xiaohui
    Lu Dagang
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024, 23 (04) : 919 - 938
  • [2] Hysteretic energy prediction method for mainshock-aftershock sequences
    Zhai Changhai
    Ji Duofa
    Wen Weiping
    Li Cuihua
    Lei Weidong
    Xie Lili
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018, 17 (02) : 277 - 291
  • [3] Hysteretic energy prediction method for mainshock-aftershock sequences
    Changhai Zhai
    Duofa Ji
    Weiping Wen
    Cuihua Li
    Weidong Lei
    Lili Xie
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018, 17 : 277 - 291
  • [4] Hysteretic energy prediction method for mainshock-aftershock sequences
    Zhai Changhai
    Ji Duofa
    Wen Weiping
    Li Cuihua
    Lei Weidong
    Xie Lili
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2018, 17 (02) : 277 - 291
  • [5] Seismic damage accumulation in multiple mainshock-aftershock sequences
    Iervolino, Iunio
    Chioccarelli, Eugenio
    Suzuki, Akiko
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2020, 49 (10): : 1007 - 1027
  • [6] Identifying Optimal Intensity Measures for Predicting Damage Potential of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences
    Zhou, Zhou
    Yu, Xiaohui
    Lu, Dagang
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (19):
  • [7] Effect of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences on Woodframe Building Damage Fragilities
    Nazari, N.
    van de Lindt, J. W.
    Li, Y.
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2015, 29 (01)
  • [8] Cumulative damage effects of mainshock-aftershock sequences on RC-frame structures
    Zhang, Lingxin
    Zhu, Baijie
    Xue, Yunqin
    Ma, Jialu
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2019, 32 (3-4): : 157 - 169
  • [9] Nonlinear Response Potential of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences from Japanese Earthquakes
    Goda, Katsuichiro
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 102 (05) : 2139 - 2156
  • [10] Cumulative damage effects of mainshock-aftershock sequences on RC-frame structures
    Lingxin Zhang
    Baijie Zhu
    Yunqin Xue
    Jialu Ma
    Earthquake Science, 2019, 32(Z1) (Z1) : 157 - 169