Energy efficient urban districts: A multi-criteria application for selecting retrofit actions

被引：10

作者：

Dirutigliano D. ^{[1
]}

Delmastro C. ^{[1
]}

Torabi Moghadam S. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abbruzzi 24, Turin

[2] Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, Turin

来源：

Dirutigliano, Domenico (domenico.dirutigliano@polito.it) | 2017年 / International Information and Engineering Technology Association卷 / 35期

关键词：

Building Stock; Energy Savings Scenarios; GIS; Multi Criteria Analysis; Urban District;

D O I：

10.18280/ijht.35Sp0107

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The definition of the new paradigms for transition strategies toward sustainable development and low-carbon cities is crucial, mainly, in the built environment sector which is the key driver of energy consumption and carbon emission. Starting from the energy characterization of the urban environment, the paper proposes a multi-criteria decision aiding model as a support tool for promoting the energy retrofitting of urban districts. The PROMETHEE methodology has been applied to a case study in the city of Torino for outranking five different proposed alternatives for buildings refurbishment that allows to achieve 20% energy saving. Three main phases characterize the study: i. analysis of the buildings stock and alternatives identification; ii. criteria definition and quantification; iii. model implementation and result discussion. The model fits well the purpose of the analysis and highlights that Multi Criteria Decision methods can provide relevant feedbacks and considerable help to building designers, planners and decision makers for ranking complex design energy options and select the most energy savings retrofitting scenario.

引用

页码：S49 / S57

页数：8

共 22 条

[1]

Ballarini I., Corgnati S.P., Corrado V., Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: The experience of TABULA project, Energy Policy, 68, pp. 273-284, (2014)

[2]

Loga T., Stein B., Diefenbach N., TABULA building typologies in 20 European countries? Making energy-related features of residential building stocks comparable, Energy and Buildings, 132, pp. 4-12, (2016)

[3]

Delmastro C., Mutani G., Perassi S., In use monitoring of public buildings. Case study in north Italy, International Journal of Heat and Technology, 34, 2, pp. S266-S276, (2016)

[4]

Bogetoft P., Pruzan P., Planning with Multiple Criteria: Investigation, Communication and Choice, (1997)

[5]

Lombardi P., Giordano S., Evaluating the european smart cities visions of the future, International Journal of The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 4, 1, (2012)

[6]

Giaccone A., Lascari G., Peri G., Rizzo G., An ex-post criticism, based on stakeholders’ preferences, of a residential sector’s energy master plan: The case study of the Sicilian region, Energy Efficiency, 10, 1, pp. 129-149, (2016)

[7]

Torabi Moghadam S., Delmastro C., Lombardi P., Corgnati S.P., Towards a new integrated spatial decision support system in Urban context, Procedia-social & Behavioral Sciences, 223, pp. 974-981, (2016)

[8]

Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L., Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update, Energy, 31, 14, pp. 2604-2621, (2006)

[9]

Hobbs B.F., Horn G.T.F., Building public confidence in energy planning: A multimethod MCDMnapproach to demand management at BC gas, 1996 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technical Expertise and Public Decisions, 25, 3, pp. 357-375, (1996)

[10]

Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Zhao J.H., Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 9, pp. 2263-2278, (2009)

← 1 2 3 →